--- title: "Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-500W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-500W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 215 W more power. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w) | [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | | Manufacturer | Leapton | Leapton | | Power | 500 Wp | 715 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.55 % | 23.12 % | | Technology | N-type | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 500 Wp | 715 Wp | +215 W for LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | | Module efficiency | 22.55 % | 23.12 % | +0.57 pp for LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | | Weight | 27.0 kg | 37.5 kg | -10.5 kg for LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W | | Open-circuit voltage | 43.97 V | 48.80 V | 4.83 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.18 A | 18.61 A | 4.43 A apart | | Module area | 2.217 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.889 m² apart | | Power density | 225.5 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +4.6 Wp/m² for LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | N-type vs TOPCon | | Voltage at max power | 36.50 V | 40.80 V | 4.30 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.70 A | 17.52 A | 3.82 A apart | | Cell count | 120 | 132 | 12 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1955x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1955x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 500 Wp | 715 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.55 % | 23.12 % | | Power density | 225.5 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 43.97 V | 48.80 V | | Voltage at max power | 36.50 V | 40.80 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.18 A | 18.61 A | | Current at max power | 13.70 A | 17.52 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1955x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 2.217 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 27.0 kg | 37.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 54.0 kg/kWp | 52.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | - | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W:** 16,776 kWh - **Cumulative output, LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W:** 23,990 kWh - **Gap:** 7,214 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 500 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 478 W | 683 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 455 W | 651 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 433 W | 618 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,905 | #1,567 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W leads by 2,338 places | | Power density | #3,882 | #2,018 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W leads by 1,864 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #8,183 | #5,979 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W leads by 2,204 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,471 | #104 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W leads by 4,367 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W or Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W? According to our database: **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-**715 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.12%** vs **22.55%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**500 W**** has a module efficiency of **22.55%**, while **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-**715 W**** is **23.12%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W use vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**500 W**** uses **N-type** cells; **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-**715 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**500 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-**715 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W bifacial panels? Both **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**500 W**** and **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-**715 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-495W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-495w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-485W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-485w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) - The same specification on paper - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.