--- title: "Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-490W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-490W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.02 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w) | [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | | Manufacturer | Leapton | Leapton | | Power | 490 Wp | 715 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.10 % | 23.12 % | | Technology | N-type | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.10 % | 23.12 % | +1.02 pp for LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | | Rated power | 490 Wp | 715 Wp | +225 W for LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | | Power density | 221.0 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +9.2 Wp/m² for LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | | Weight | 27.0 kg | 34.0 kg | -7.0 kg for LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W | | Weight per kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp | 47.6 kg/kWp | -7.5 kg/kWp for LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | | Open-circuit voltage | 43.67 V | 48.80 V | 5.13 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.00 A | 18.61 A | 4.61 A apart | | Module area | 2.217 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.889 m² apart | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | N-type vs TOPCon | | Voltage at max power | 36.19 V | 40.80 V | 4.61 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.54 A | 17.52 A | 3.98 A apart | | Cell count | 120 | 132 | 12 cells apart | | Bifacial | Yes | No | Yes vs No | | Dimensions | 1955x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1955x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 490 Wp | 715 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.10 % | 23.12 % | | Power density | 221.0 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 43.67 V | 48.80 V | | Voltage at max power | 36.19 V | 40.80 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.00 A | 18.61 A | | Current at max power | 13.54 A | 17.52 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1955x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 2.217 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 27.0 kg | 34.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp | 47.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W:** 16,440 kWh - **Cumulative output, LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W:** 23,990 kWh - **Gap:** 7,550 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 490 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 468 W | 683 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 446 W | 651 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 424 W | 618 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #6,012 | #1,567 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 4,445 places | | Power density | #5,998 | #2,018 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 3,980 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,526 | #1,753 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 7,773 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,338 | #92 | 14,005 | LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 5,246 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W or Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W? According to our database: **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.12%** vs **22.10%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**490 W**** has a module efficiency of **22.10%**, while **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** is **23.12%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W use vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**490 W**** uses **N-type** cells; **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**490 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W bifacial panels? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-**490 W**** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-500W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-500w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-495W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-495w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-490W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NB-485W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-485w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) - The same specification on paper - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nb-490w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.