---
title: "Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-ebmh-560w-d/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD

FCMH-715W-HD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.12 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D](https://comparepv.com/panel/just-solar-jst-ebmh-560w-d) | [Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd) |
| Manufacturer | Just Solar | Just Solar |
| Power | 560 Wp | 715 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.90 % | 23.02 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | EBMH-560W-D | FCMH-715W-HD | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.90 % | 23.02 % | +1.12 pp for FCMH-715W-HD |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.360 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | +0.100 %/°C for FCMH-715W-HD |
| Rated power | 560 Wp | 715 Wp | +155 W for FCMH-715W-HD |
| Power density | 216.7 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +13.5 Wp/m² for FCMH-715W-HD |
| Annual degradation | 0.59 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr | -0.29 %/yr for FCMH-715W-HD |
| Weight | 29.0 kg | 38.3 kg | -9.3 kg for EBMH-560W-D |
| Short-circuit current | 14.10 A | 17.27 A | 3.17 A apart |
| Module area | 2.584 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.522 m² apart |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | HJT | TOPCon vs HJT |
| Current at max power | 13.33 A | 16.37 A | 3.04 A apart |
| Cell count | 144 | 132 | 12 cells apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Dimensions | 2279x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2279x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm |
| Voltage at max power | 42.00 V | 43.68 V | 1.68 V apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | EBMH-560W-D | FCMH-715W-HD |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 560 Wp | 715 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.90 % | 23.02 % |
| Power density | 216.7 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.20 V | 50.91 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.00 V | 43.68 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.10 A | 17.27 A |
| Current at max power | 13.33 A | 16.37 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.360 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2279x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm |
| Module area | 2.584 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 29.0 kg | 38.3 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 51.8 kg/kWp | 53.6 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.59 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 132 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, EBMH-560W-D:** 17,831 kWh
- **Cumulative output, FCMH-715W-HD:** 24,363 kWh
- **Gap:** 6,532 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | EBMH-560W-D | FCMH-715W-HD | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 560 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 530 W | 687 W | 94.6% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 500 W | 659 W | 89.2% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 469 W | 631 W | 83.8% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | EBMH-560W-D | FCMH-715W-HD | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #6,783 | #1,797 | 14,005 | FCMH-715W-HD leads by 4,986 places |
| Power density | #7,538 | #2,018 | 14,005 | FCMH-715W-HD leads by 5,520 places |
| Heat behaviour | #12,345 | #511 | 14,005 | FCMH-715W-HD leads by 11,834 places |
| Weight | #5,155 | #7,566 | 14,005 | EBMH-560W-D leads by 2,411 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #5,159 | #450 | 14,005 | FCMH-715W-HD leads by 4,709 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D or Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD?

According to our database: **Just Solar JST-FCMH-**715 W**-HD** has higher module efficiency (**23.02%** vs **21.90%**); **Just Solar JST-FCMH-**715 W**-HD** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.360%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D and Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD?

**Just Solar JST-EBMH-**560 W**-D** has a module efficiency of **21.90%**, while **Just Solar JST-FCMH-**715 W**-HD** is **23.02%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D use vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD?

**Just Solar JST-EBMH-**560 W**-D** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Just Solar JST-FCMH-**715 W**-HD** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D and Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD?

**Just Solar JST-EBMH-**560 W**-D** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Just Solar JST-FCMH-**715 W**-HD** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D and Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD bifacial panels?

**Just Solar JST-FCMH-**715 W**-HD** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Just Solar JST-EBMH-**560 W**-D** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D vs Just Solar JST-EBMH-555W-D](https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-ebmh-560w-d/just-solar-jst-ebmh-555w-d) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-740W-HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd/just-solar-jst-fcmh-740w-hd) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-735W-HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd/just-solar-jst-fcmh-735w-hd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-730W-HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd/just-solar-jst-fcmh-730w-hd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-725W-HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd/just-solar-jst-fcmh-725w-hd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-720W-HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd/just-solar-jst-fcmh-720w-hd) - The same specification on paper


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/just-solar-jst-ebmh-560w-d/just-solar-jst-fcmh-715w-hd

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

