--- title: "Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-470" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 470 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465) | [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-470) | | Manufacturer | Jolywood | Jolywood | | Power | 465 Wp | 470 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.50 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 465 | 470 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.50 % | +0.20 pp for 470 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 465 | 470 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 470 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.50 % | | Power density | 232.7 Wp/m² | 235.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 35.51 V | 35.71 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.52 V | 30.70 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.07 A | 16.14 A | | Current at max power | 15.24 A | 15.31 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 24.6 kg | 24.6 kg | | Weight per kWp | 52.9 kg/kWp | 52.3 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 96 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 465:** 15,602 kWh - **Cumulative output, 470:** 15,769 kWh - **Gap:** 167 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 465 | 470 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 465 W | 470 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 445 W | 450 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 426 W | 431 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 406 W | 411 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 465 | 470 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,017 | #716 | 14,005 | 470 leads by 301 places | | Power density | #1,115 | #674 | 14,005 | 470 leads by 441 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #6,621 | #5,827 | 14,005 | 470 leads by 794 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,775 | #4,371 | 14,005 | 470 leads by 404 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 or Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470? According to our database: **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470** has higher module efficiency (**23.50%** vs **23.30%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470? **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** has a module efficiency of **23.30%**, while **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470** is **23.50%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 use vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470? **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470? **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 bifacial panels? Both **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** and **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460) - One difference: module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-455) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-450](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-450) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-445) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-470 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.