--- title: "Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 465 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460) | [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465) | | Manufacturer | Jolywood | Jolywood | | Power | 460 Wp | 465 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.30 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 460 | 465 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.30 % | +0.30 pp for 465 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 460 | 465 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 460 Wp | 465 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.30 % | | Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 232.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 35.31 V | 35.51 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.34 V | 30.52 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.00 A | 16.07 A | | Current at max power | 15.16 A | 15.24 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 24.6 kg | 24.6 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp | 52.9 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 96 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 460:** 15,434 kWh - **Cumulative output, 465:** 15,602 kWh - **Gap:** 168 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 460 | 465 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 460 W | 465 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 441 W | 445 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 421 W | 426 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 402 W | 406 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 460 | 465 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,919 | #1,017 | 14,005 | 465 leads by 902 places | | Power density | #1,876 | #1,115 | 14,005 | 465 leads by 761 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #7,436 | #6,621 | 14,005 | 465 leads by 815 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,285 | #4,775 | 14,005 | 465 leads by 510 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 or Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465? According to our database: **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** has higher module efficiency (**23.30%** vs **23.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465? **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** is **23.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 use vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465? **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465? **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465 bifacial panels? Both **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460** and **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-470) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-455) - One difference: module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-450](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-450) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-445) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-460/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-465 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.