--- title: "Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-455" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 11 differences, and they point both ways The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | [Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-455) | | Manufacturer | Jolywood | Jolywood | | Power | 715 Wp | 455 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.00 % | 22.80 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | HD132N-715 | HD96N-R2-455 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 715 Wp | 455 Wp | +260 W for HD132N-715 | | Weight | 38.1 kg | 24.6 kg | -13.5 kg for HD96N-R2-455 | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 25 yrs | +13 yrs for HD96N-R2-455 | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.14 V | 35.11 V | 13.03 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 18.28 A | 15.93 A | 2.35 A apart | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 1.998 m² | 1.108 m² apart | | Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 22.80 % | +0.20 pp for HD132N-715 | | Voltage at max power | 41.32 V | 30.16 V | 11.16 V apart | | Current at max power | 17.30 A | 15.09 A | 2.21 A apart | | Cell count | 132 | 96 | 36 cells apart | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | HD132N-715 | HD96N-R2-455 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 715 Wp | 455 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 22.80 % | | Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 227.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.14 V | 35.11 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.32 V | 30.16 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.28 A | 15.93 A | | Current at max power | 17.30 A | 15.09 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 38.1 kg | 24.6 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.3 kg/kWp | 54.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 96 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, HD132N-715:** 23,990 kWh - **Cumulative output, HD96N-R2-455:** 15,266 kWh - **Gap:** 8,724 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | HD132N-715 | HD96N-R2-455 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 715 W | 455 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 685 W | 436 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 655 W | 417 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 625 W | 398 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | HD132N-715 | HD96N-R2-455 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,919 | #2,714 | 14,005 | HD132N-715 leads by 795 places | | Power density | #2,018 | #2,888 | 14,005 | HD132N-715 leads by 870 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #7,172 | #8,287 | 14,005 | HD132N-715 leads by 1,115 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #678 | #5,669 | 14,005 | HD132N-715 leads by 4,991 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 or Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455? According to our database: **Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** has higher module efficiency (**23.00%** vs **22.80%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455? **Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455** is **22.80%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 use vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455? **Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455? **Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 bifacial panels? Both **Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** and **Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) - The same specification on paper - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) - The same specification on paper - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) - The same specification on paper - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd96n-r2-455 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.