---
title: "Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) |
| Manufacturer | Jolywood | Jolywood |
| Power | 715 Wp | 715 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.00 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 715 | 715W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 715 Wp | 715 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.00 % |
| Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 48.14 V | 48.14 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.32 V | 41.32 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.28 A | 18.28 A |
| Current at max power | 17.30 A | 17.30 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 38.1 kg | 38.1 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 53.3 kg/kWp | 53.3 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 715:** 23,990 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 715W:** 23,990 kWh
- **Gap:** No difference


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 715 | 715W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 715 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 685 W | 685 W | 95.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 655 W | 655 W | 91.6% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 625 W | 625 W | 87.4% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 715 | 715W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,919 | #1,919 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Power density | #2,018 | #2,018 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #7,172 | #7,172 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #678 | #678 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

**Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** is **23.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

**Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

**Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W bifacial panels?

Both **Jolywood JW-HD132N-715** and **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) - The same specification on paper
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) - The same specification on paper
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

