---
title: "Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710

710 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | [Jolywood JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) |
| Manufacturer | Jolywood | Jolywood |
| Power | 705 Wp | 710 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.70 % | 22.90 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 705 | 710 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.70 % | 22.90 % | +0.20 pp for 710 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 705 | 710 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 705 Wp | 710 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.70 % | 22.90 % |
| Power density | 227.0 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 47.78 V | 47.96 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.00 V | 41.16 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.20 A | 18.24 A |
| Current at max power | 17.20 A | 17.25 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 38.1 kg | 38.1 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 54.0 kg/kWp | 53.7 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 705:** 23,654 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 710:** 23,822 kWh
- **Gap:** 168 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 705 | 710 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 705 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 675 W | 680 W | 95.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 646 W | 650 W | 91.6% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 616 W | 621 W | 87.4% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 705 | 710 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #3,307 | #2,359 | 14,005 | 710 leads by 948 places |
| Power density | #3,361 | #2,474 | 14,005 | 710 leads by 887 places |
| Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #8,262 | #7,679 | 14,005 | 710 leads by 583 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #1,007 | #817 | 14,005 | 710 leads by 190 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-710?

According to our database: **Jolywood JW-HD132N-710** has higher module efficiency (**22.90%** vs **22.70%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-710?

**Jolywood JW-HD132N-705** has a module efficiency of **22.70%**, while **Jolywood JW-HD132N-710** is **22.90%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710?

**Jolywood JW-HD132N-705** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jolywood JW-HD132N-710** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-710?

**Jolywood JW-HD132N-705** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jolywood JW-HD132N-710** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-710 bifacial panels?

Both **Jolywood JW-HD132N-705** and **Jolywood JW-HD132N-710** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) - The same specification on paper
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) - One difference: module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

