--- title: "Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W HD108N-R2-520 leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 195 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520) | [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | | Manufacturer | Jolywood | Jolywood | | Power | 520 Wp | 715 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.40 % | 23.00 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | HD108N-R2-520 | HD132N-715W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 520 Wp | 715 Wp | +195 W for HD132N-715W | | Weight | 27.3 kg | 38.1 kg | -10.8 kg for HD108N-R2-520 | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 12 yrs | +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-520 | | Module efficiency | 23.40 % | 23.00 % | +0.40 pp for HD108N-R2-520 | | Open-circuit voltage | 39.83 V | 48.14 V | 8.31 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 16.02 A | 18.28 A | 2.26 A apart | | Module area | 2.223 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.884 m² apart | | Power density | 234.0 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +3.8 Wp/m² for HD108N-R2-520 | | Voltage at max power | 34.22 V | 41.32 V | 7.10 V apart | | Current at max power | 15.19 A | 17.30 A | 2.11 A apart | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | 24 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1960x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | HD108N-R2-520 | HD132N-715W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 520 Wp | 715 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.40 % | 23.00 % | | Power density | 234.0 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 39.83 V | 48.14 V | | Voltage at max power | 34.22 V | 41.32 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.02 A | 18.28 A | | Current at max power | 15.19 A | 17.30 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1960x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 2.223 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 27.3 kg | 38.1 kg | | Weight per kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | 53.3 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, HD108N-R2-520:** 17,447 kWh - **Cumulative output, HD132N-715W:** 23,990 kWh - **Gap:** 6,543 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | HD108N-R2-520 | HD132N-715W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 520 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 498 W | 685 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 476 W | 655 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 454 W | 625 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | HD108N-R2-520 | HD132N-715W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #882 | #1,919 | 14,005 | HD108N-R2-520 leads by 1,037 places | | Power density | #898 | #2,018 | 14,005 | HD108N-R2-520 leads by 1,120 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #6,043 | #7,172 | 14,005 | HD108N-R2-520 leads by 1,129 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #2,797 | #678 | 14,005 | HD132N-715W leads by 2,119 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W? According to our database: **Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520** has higher module efficiency (**23.40%** vs **23.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W? **Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520** has a module efficiency of **23.40%**, while **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** is **23.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W? **Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W? **Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W bifacial panels? Both **Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520** and **Jolywood JW-HD132N-**715 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-525) - One difference: module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-515](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-515) - One difference: module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-510) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-505](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-505) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-500) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) - The same specification on paper --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd108n-r2-520/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.