--- title: "Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-510" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 Identical on every published parameter All 17 comparable parameters agree, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505) | [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-510) | | Manufacturer | Jinko Solar | Jinko Solar | | Power | 505 Wp | 510 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.30 % | 21.47 % | | Technology | PERC | PERC | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 505 | 510 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 505 Wp | 510 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.30 % | 21.47 % | | Power density | 212.7 Wp/m² | 214.8 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.40 V | 45.60 V | | Voltage at max power | 38.10 V | 38.40 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.88 A | 13.94 A | | Current at max power | 13.32 A | 13.39 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.340 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2094x1134x30 mm | 2094x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 2.375 m² | 2.375 m² | | Weight | 26.0 kg | 26.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 51.5 kg/kWp | 51.0 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | - | - | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Annual degradation | - | - | | Cell technology | PERC | PERC | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 505:** 16,762 kWh - **Cumulative output, 510:** 16,928 kWh - **Gap:** 166 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 505 | 510 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 505 W | 510 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 479 W | 484 W | 94.9% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 453 W | 458 W | 89.8% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 428 W | 432 W | 84.7% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 505 | 510 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #8,519 | #8,240 | 14,005 | 510 leads by 279 places | | Power density | #8,757 | #8,130 | 14,005 | 510 leads by 627 places | | Heat behaviour | #8,778 | #8,778 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #4,854 | #4,341 | 14,005 | 510 leads by 513 places | | Warranty | #9,798 | #9,798 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #11,082 | #10,867 | 14,005 | 510 leads by 215 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510? According to our database: **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510** has higher module efficiency (**21.47%** vs **21.30%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510? **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505** has a module efficiency of **21.30%**, while **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510** is **21.47%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510? **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505** uses **PERC** cells; **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510? **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550](https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc144-550) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power - [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545](https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc144-545) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540](https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc144-540) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535](https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc144-535) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530](https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc144-530) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525](https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc144-525) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-505/jinko-solar-js182mhc132-510 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.