---
title: "JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-635-lb"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB

JAM72D40-615/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb) | [JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam72d42-635-lb) |
| Manufacturer | JA Solar | JA Solar |
| Power | 615 Wp | 635 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.20 % | 22.70 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | JAM72D40-615/LB | JAM72D42-635/LB | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.20 % | 22.70 % | +0.50 pp for JAM72D40-615/LB |
| Rated power | 615 Wp | 635 Wp | +20 W for JAM72D42-635/LB |
| Module area | 2.646 m² | 2.795 m² | 0.150 m² apart |
| Power density | 232.5 Wp/m² | 227.2 Wp/m² | +5.3 Wp/m² for JAM72D40-615/LB |
| Weight | 32.5 kg | 34.6 kg | -2.1 kg for JAM72D40-615/LB |
| Short-circuit current | 14.61 A | 15.26 A | 0.65 A apart |
| Dimensions | 2333x1134x30 mm | 2465x1134x30 mm | 2333x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm |
| Current at max power | 13.89 A | 14.40 A | 0.51 A apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | JAM72D40-615/LB | JAM72D42-635/LB |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 615 Wp | 635 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.20 % | 22.70 % |
| Power density | 232.5 Wp/m² | 227.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 53.00 V | 52.67 V |
| Voltage at max power | 44.28 V | 44.10 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.61 A | 15.26 A |
| Current at max power | 13.89 A | 14.40 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2333x1134x30 mm | 2465x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.646 m² | 2.795 m² |
| Weight | 32.5 kg | 34.6 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 52.8 kg/kWp | 54.5 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 144 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, JAM72D40-615/LB:** 20,634 kWh
- **Cumulative output, JAM72D42-635/LB:** 21,306 kWh
- **Gap:** 672 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | JAM72D40-615/LB | JAM72D42-635/LB | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 615 W | 635 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 588 W | 607 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 561 W | 580 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 535 W | 552 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | JAM72D40-615/LB | JAM72D42-635/LB | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,306 | #3,307 | 14,005 | JAM72D40-615/LB leads by 2,001 places |
| Power density | #1,249 | #3,252 | 14,005 | JAM72D40-615/LB leads by 2,003 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #6,546 | #8,832 | 14,005 | JAM72D40-615/LB leads by 2,286 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #2,486 | #2,396 | 14,005 | JAM72D42-635/LB leads by 90 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB or JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB?

According to our database: **JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB** has higher module efficiency (**23.20%** vs **22.70%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB?

**JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB** has a module efficiency of **23.20%**, while **JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB** is **22.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB use vs JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB?

**JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB** uses **TOPCon** cells; **JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB?

**JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB** has a **30 years** power warranty; **JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB bifacial panels?

Both **JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB** and **JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-650/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-650-lb) - 6 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-645/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-645-lb) - 6 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-640/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-640-lb) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-630-lb) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-625-lb) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d40-610-lb) - The same specification on paper


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam72d40-615-lb/ja-solar-jam72d42-635-lb

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

