---
title: "JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam60d42-525-lb"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB

JAM60D41-510/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1) | [JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam60d42-525-lb) |
| Manufacturer | JA Solar | JA Solar |
| Power | 510 Wp | 525 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.00 % | 22.40 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | JAM60D41-510/LB | JAM60D42-525/LB | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 22.40 % | +0.60 pp for JAM60D41-510/LB |
| Module area | 2.215 m² | 2.339 m² | 0.125 m² apart |
| Power density | 230.3 Wp/m² | 224.4 Wp/m² | +5.9 Wp/m² for JAM60D41-510/LB |
| Rated power | 510 Wp | 525 Wp | +15 W for JAM60D42-525/LB |
| Weight | 27.3 kg | 28.8 kg | -1.5 kg for JAM60D41-510/LB |
| Short-circuit current | 14.54 A | 15.21 A | 0.67 A apart |
| Dimensions | 1953x1134x30 mm | 2063x1134x30 mm | 1953x1134x30 mm vs 2063x1134x30 mm |
| Current at max power | 13.67 A | 14.35 A | 0.68 A apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | JAM60D41-510/LB | JAM60D42-525/LB |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 510 Wp | 525 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 22.40 % |
| Power density | 230.3 Wp/m² | 224.4 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 44.25 V | 43.73 V |
| Voltage at max power | 37.31 V | 36.59 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.54 A | 15.21 A |
| Current at max power | 13.67 A | 14.35 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1953x1134x30 mm | 2063x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.215 m² | 2.339 m² |
| Weight | 27.3 kg | 28.8 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp | 54.9 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 120 | 120 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, JAM60D41-510/LB:** 17,112 kWh
- **Cumulative output, JAM60D42-525/LB:** 17,615 kWh
- **Gap:** 503 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | JAM60D41-510/LB | JAM60D42-525/LB | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 510 W | 525 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 488 W | 502 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 466 W | 479 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 443 W | 456 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | JAM60D41-510/LB | JAM60D42-525/LB | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,919 | #4,774 | 14,005 | JAM60D41-510/LB leads by 2,855 places |
| Power density | #1,849 | #4,725 | 14,005 | JAM60D41-510/LB leads by 2,876 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #7,509 | #9,248 | 14,005 | JAM60D41-510/LB leads by 1,739 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,280 | #6,511 | 14,005 | JAM60D41-510/LB leads by 231 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB or JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB?

According to our database: **JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB** has higher module efficiency (**23.00%** vs **22.40%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB and JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB?

**JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB** is **22.40%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB use vs JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB?

**JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB** uses **TOPCon** cells; **JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB and JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB?

**JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB** has a **30 years** power warranty; **JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB and JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB bifacial panels?

Both **JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB** and **JA Solar JAM60D42-525/LB** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam66d45-630-lb) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam66d45-625-lb) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam66d45-620-lb) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam66d45-615-lb) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam66d45-610-lb) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power
- [JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-605/LB](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam66d45-605-lb) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam60d41-510-lb-1/ja-solar-jam60d42-525-lb

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

