--- title: "Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/ja-solar-jam54d40-470-lr" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/ja-solar-jam54d40-470-lr.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR 12 differences, and they point both ways The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf) | [JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam54d40-470-lr) | | Manufacturer | Hyundai | JA Solar | | Power | 455 Wp | 470 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.80 % | 23.50 % | | Technology | HJT | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | HiT-H455CE-BF | JAM54D40-470/LR | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | +0.050 %/°C for HiT-H455CE-BF | | Module efficiency | 22.80 % | 23.50 % | +0.70 pp for JAM54D40-470/LR | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 15 yrs | +15 yrs for HiT-H455CE-BF | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 235.2 Wp/m² | +7.5 Wp/m² for JAM54D40-470/LR | | Open-circuit voltage | 36.82 V | 40.40 V | 3.58 V apart | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 470 Wp | +15 W for JAM54D40-470/LR | | Cell technology | HJT | N-type | HJT vs N-type | | Cell count | 96 | 108 | 12 cells apart | | Short-circuit current | 15.64 A | 14.66 A | 0.98 A apart | | Bifacial | Yes | No | Yes vs No | | Voltage at max power | 30.94 V | 33.84 V | 2.90 V apart | | Current at max power | 14.71 A | 13.89 A | 0.82 A apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | HiT-H455CE-BF | JAM54D40-470/LR | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 470 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.80 % | 23.50 % | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 235.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 36.82 V | 40.40 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.94 V | 33.84 V | | Short-circuit current | 15.64 A | 14.66 A | | Current at max power | 14.71 A | 13.89 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 21.8 kg | 22.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 47.9 kg/kWp | 46.8 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | - | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | HJT | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 108 | | Bifacial | Yes | No | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, HiT-H455CE-BF:** 15,266 kWh - **Cumulative output, JAM54D40-470/LR:** 15,769 kWh - **Gap:** 503 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | HiT-H455CE-BF | JAM54D40-470/LR | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 455 W | 470 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 439 W | 450 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 422 W | 429 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 406 W | 409 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | HiT-H455CE-BF | JAM54D40-470/LR | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #2,714 | #716 | 14,005 | JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 1,998 places | | Power density | #2,888 | #674 | 14,005 | JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 2,214 places | | Heat behaviour | #13 | #2,165 | 14,005 | HiT-H455CE-BF leads by 2,152 places | | Weight | #1,971 | #1,356 | 14,005 | JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 615 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,609 | #6,332 | 14,005 | HiT-H455CE-BF leads by 1,723 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF or JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR? According to our database: **JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR** has higher module efficiency (**23.50%** vs **22.80%**); **Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.240%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR? **Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF** has a module efficiency of **22.80%**, while **JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR** is **23.50%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF use vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR? **Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF** uses **HJT** cells; **JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR? **Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF** has a **30 years** power warranty; **JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR bifacial panels? **Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) - One difference: module efficiency - [Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H450CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/hyundai-hit-h450ce-bf) - One difference: module efficiency - [Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H445CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/hyundai-hit-h445ce-bf) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H440CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/hyundai-hit-h440ce-bf) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam54d40-470-lr/ja-solar-jam54d40-475-lr) - One difference: module efficiency - [JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR](https://comparepv.com/compare/ja-solar-jam54d40-470-lr/ja-solar-jam54d40-465-lr) - One difference: module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h455ce-bf/ja-solar-jam54d40-470-lr Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.