--- title: "Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 635 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625) | [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | | Manufacturer | Q-Cells | Q-Cells | | Power | 625 Wp | 635 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.40 % | 22.70 % | | Technology | N-type | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 625 | 635 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.40 % | 22.70 % | +0.30 pp for 635 | | Power density | 223.9 Wp/m² | 227.4 Wp/m² | +3.6 Wp/m² for 635 | | Rated power | 625 Wp | 635 Wp | +10 W for 635 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 625 | 635 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 625 Wp | 635 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.40 % | 22.70 % | | Power density | 223.9 Wp/m² | 227.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 56.95 V | 57.51 V | | Voltage at max power | 47.70 V | 48.09 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.82 A | 13.93 A | | Current at max power | 13.10 A | 13.21 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2462x1134x35 mm | 2462x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.792 m² | 2.792 m² | | Weight | 35.4 kg | 35.4 kg | | Weight per kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | 55.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.33 %/yr | 0.33 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 156 | 156 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 625:** 21,086 kWh - **Cumulative output, 635:** 21,423 kWh - **Gap:** 337 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 625 | 635 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 625 W | 635 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 597 W | 606 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 569 W | 578 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 541 W | 549 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 625 | 635 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #4,774 | #3,307 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 1,467 places | | Power density | #4,872 | #3,192 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 1,680 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #10,791 | #10,141 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 650 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,038 | #2,404 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 634 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 or Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635? According to our database: **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** has higher module efficiency (**22.70%** vs **22.40%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635? **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625** has a module efficiency of **22.40%**, while **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** is **22.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 use vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635? **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625** uses **N-type** cells; **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635? **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 bifacial panels? Both **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625** and **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) - One difference: module efficiency - [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620) - One difference: module efficiency - [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 615](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-615) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 610](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-610) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.