---
title: "Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635

635 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620) | [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) |
| Manufacturer | Q-Cells | Q-Cells |
| Power | 620 Wp | 635 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.20 % | 22.70 % |
| Technology | N-type | N-type |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 620 | 635 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.20 % | 22.70 % | +0.50 pp for 635 |
| Power density | 222.1 Wp/m² | 227.4 Wp/m² | +5.4 Wp/m² for 635 |
| Rated power | 620 Wp | 635 Wp | +15 W for 635 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 620 | 635 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 620 Wp | 635 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.20 % | 22.70 % |
| Power density | 222.1 Wp/m² | 227.4 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 56.67 V | 57.51 V |
| Voltage at max power | 47.50 V | 48.09 V |
| Short-circuit current | 13.76 A | 13.93 A |
| Current at max power | 13.05 A | 13.21 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2462x1134x35 mm | 2462x1134x35 mm |
| Module area | 2.792 m² | 2.792 m² |
| Weight | 35.4 kg | 35.4 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 57.1 kg/kWp | 55.7 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.33 %/yr | 0.33 %/yr |
| Cell technology | N-type | N-type |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 156 | 156 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 620:** 20,917 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 635:** 21,423 kWh
- **Gap:** 506 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 620 | 635 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 620 W | 635 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 592 W | 606 W | 95.5% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 564 W | 578 W | 91.0% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 536 W | 549 W | 86.5% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 620 | 635 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #5,817 | #3,307 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 2,510 places |
| Power density | #5,847 | #3,192 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 2,655 places |
| Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #11,047 | #10,141 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 906 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #3,468 | #2,404 | 14,005 | 635 leads by 1,064 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 or Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635?

According to our database: **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** has higher module efficiency (**22.70%** vs **22.20%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635?

**Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620** has a module efficiency of **22.20%**, while **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** is **22.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 use vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635?

**Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620** uses **N-type** cells; **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635?

**Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 bifacial panels?

Both **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620** and **Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-625) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 615](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-615) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 610](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-610) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-620/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

