---
title: "Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675

TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.040 %/°C better in heat. 2 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w) | [Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) |
| Manufacturer | Q-Cells | Q-Cells |
| Power | 430 Wp | 675 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.00 % | 21.70 % |
| Technology | N-type |  |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) | PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C | +0.040 %/°C for TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) |
| Rated power | 430 Wp | 675 Wp | +245 W for PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 |
| Weight | 22.9 kg | 38.2 kg | -15.3 kg for TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 12 yrs | +13 yrs for TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) |
| Annual degradation | 0.33 %/yr | 0.45 %/yr | -0.12 %/yr for TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) |
| Open-circuit voltage | 39.32 V | 45.74 V | 6.42 V apart |
| Short-circuit current | 13.74 A | 18.45 A | 4.71 A apart |
| Module area | 1.953 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.154 m² apart |
| Module efficiency | 22.00 % | 21.70 % | +0.30 pp for TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) |
| Weight per kWp | 53.4 kg/kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | -3.2 kg/kWp for TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) |
| Voltage at max power | 32.94 V | 38.43 V | 5.49 V apart |
| Current at max power | 13.05 A | 17.56 A | 4.51 A apart |
| Cell count | 216 | 132 | 84 cells apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Dimensions | 1722x1134x40 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | 1722x1134x40 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) | PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 430 Wp | 675 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.00 % | 21.70 % |
| Power density | 220.2 Wp/m² | 217.3 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 39.32 V | 45.74 V |
| Voltage at max power | 32.94 V | 38.43 V |
| Short-circuit current | 13.74 A | 18.45 A |
| Current at max power | 13.05 A | 17.56 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1722x1134x40 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 1.953 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 22.9 kg | 38.2 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 53.4 kg/kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.33 %/yr | 0.45 %/yr |
| Cell technology | N-type | - |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 216 | 132 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W):** 14,507 kWh
- **Cumulative output, PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675:** 22,228 kWh
- **Gap:** 7,721 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) | PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 430 W | 675 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 411 W | 641 W | 94.9% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 391 W | 606 W | 89.8% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 372 W | 572 W | 84.7% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) | PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #6,517 | #7,421 | 14,005 | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 904 places |
| Power density | #6,481 | #7,349 | 14,005 | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 868 places |
| Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #8,778 | 14,005 | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 2,685 places |
| Weight | #7,269 | #10,738 | 14,005 | TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 3,469 places |
| Warranty | #9,798 | #21 | 14,005 | PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads by 9,777 places |
| Overall | #8,695 | #2,198 | 14,005 | PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads by 6,497 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?

According to our database: **Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class **430 W**)** has higher module efficiency (**22.00%** vs **21.70%**); **Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class **430 W**)** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.300%/°C** vs **-0.340%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?

**Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class **430 W**)** has a module efficiency of **22.00%**, while **Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675** is **21.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?

**Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class **430 W**)** uses **N-type** cells; **Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675** uses Monocrystalline. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?

**Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class **430 W**)** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 bifacial panels?

**Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class **430 W**)** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-h1-ac-power-class-440w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.D1+/AC (Power class 435W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-d1-ac-power-class-435w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-e1-ac-power-class-425w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.1+/AC (Power class 420W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-1-ac-power-class-420w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+/AC (Power class 415W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-ac-power-class-415w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/compare/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) - The same specification on paper


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-blk-m-g2-c1-ac-power-class-430w/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.