---
title: "Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72h595w"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72h595w.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W

72H595W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w) | [Hanersun HN18N-72H595W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn18n-72h595w) |
| Manufacturer | Hanersun | Hanersun |
| Power | 585 Wp | 595 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.60 % | 23.00 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 72H585W | 72H595W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.60 % | 23.00 % | +0.40 pp for 72H595W |
| Power density | 226.5 Wp/m² | 230.3 Wp/m² | +3.9 Wp/m² for 72H595W |
| Rated power | 585 Wp | 595 Wp | +10 W for 72H595W |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 72H585W | 72H595W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 585 Wp | 595 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.60 % | 23.00 % |
| Power density | 226.5 Wp/m² | 230.3 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 51.60 V | 52.00 V |
| Voltage at max power | 43.40 V | 43.80 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.29 A | 14.41 A |
| Current at max power | 13.48 A | 13.59 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2278x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.583 m² | 2.583 m² |
| Weight | 26.0 kg | 26.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 44.4 kg/kWp | 43.7 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 144 |
| Bifacial | No | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 72H585W:** 19,628 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 72H595W:** 19,963 kWh
- **Gap:** 335 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 72H585W | 72H595W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 585 W | 595 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 560 W | 570 W | 95.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 536 W | 545 W | 91.6% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 511 W | 520 W | 87.4% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 72H585W | 72H595W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #3,716 | #1,970 | 14,129 | 72H595W leads by 1,746 places |
| Power density | #3,557 | #1,809 | 14,129 | 72H595W leads by 1,748 places |
| Heat behaviour | #1,347 | #1,347 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #455 | #333 | 14,129 | 72H595W leads by 122 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #1,740 | #1,345 | 14,129 | 72H595W leads by 395 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Hanersun HN18N-72H585W or Hanersun HN18N-72H595W?

According to our database: **Hanersun HN18N-72H**595 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.00%** vs **22.60%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN18N-72H585W and Hanersun HN18N-72H595W?

**Hanersun HN18N-72H**585 W**** has a module efficiency of **22.60%**, while **Hanersun HN18N-72H**595 W**** is **23.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Hanersun HN18N-72H585W use vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W?

**Hanersun HN18N-72H**585 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Hanersun HN18N-72H**595 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Hanersun HN18N-72H585W and Hanersun HN18N-72H595W?

**Hanersun HN18N-72H**585 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Hanersun HN18N-72H**595 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


## Related comparisons

- [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT600W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht600w) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht595w) - 7 differences, the largest is weight
- [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H590W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72h590w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT590W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht590w) - 5 differences, the largest is weight
- [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18-72HT585W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18-72ht585w) - 5 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
- [Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18-72H585W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18-72h585w) - 5 differences, the largest is performance warranty


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-72h585w/hanersun-hn18n-72h595w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

