--- title: "Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht595w" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht595w.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W 72HT595W leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 155 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w) | [Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn18n-72ht595w) | | Manufacturer | Hanersun | Hanersun | | Power | 440 Wp | 595 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.00 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 54HT440W | 72HT595W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 440 Wp | 595 Wp | +155 W for 72HT595W | | Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.00 % | +0.50 pp for 72HT595W | | Weight | 24.5 kg | 30.9 kg | -6.4 kg for 54HT440W | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | +10 yrs for 54HT440W | | Open-circuit voltage | 38.70 V | 52.00 V | 13.30 V apart | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 2.583 m² | 0.631 m² apart | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 230.3 Wp/m² | +5.0 Wp/m² for 72HT595W | | Weight per kWp | 55.7 kg/kWp | 51.9 kg/kWp | -3.7 kg/kWp for 72HT595W | | Voltage at max power | 32.70 V | 43.80 V | 11.10 V apart | | Cell count | 108 | 144 | 36 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 54HT440W | 72HT595W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 440 Wp | 595 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.00 % | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 230.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 38.70 V | 52.00 V | | Voltage at max power | 32.70 V | 43.80 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.26 A | 14.41 A | | Current at max power | 13.46 A | 13.59 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 2.583 m² | | Weight | 24.5 kg | 30.9 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.7 kg/kWp | 51.9 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 54HT440W:** 14,763 kWh - **Cumulative output, 72HT595W:** 19,963 kWh - **Gap:** 5,200 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 54HT440W | 72HT595W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 440 W | 595 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 422 W | 570 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 403 W | 545 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 385 W | 520 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 54HT440W | 72HT595W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #4,281 | #1,970 | 14,129 | 72HT595W leads by 2,311 places | | Power density | #4,158 | #1,809 | 14,129 | 72HT595W leads by 2,349 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,347 | #1,347 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #10,132 | #5,387 | 14,129 | 72HT595W leads by 4,745 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #6,681 | #2,782 | 14,129 | 72HT595W leads by 3,899 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W or Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W? According to our database: **Hanersun HN18N-72HT**595 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.00%** vs **22.50%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W? **Hanersun HN18N-54HT**440 W**** has a module efficiency of **22.50%**, while **Hanersun HN18N-72HT**595 W**** is **23.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W use vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W? **Hanersun HN18N-54HT**440 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Hanersun HN18N-72HT**595 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W? **Hanersun HN18N-54HT**440 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Hanersun HN18N-72HT**595 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W bifacial panels? Both **Hanersun HN18N-54HT**440 W**** and **Hanersun HN18N-72HT**595 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT600W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht600w) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72h595w) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H590W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72h590w) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT590W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht590w) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18-72HT585W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18-72ht585w) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W vs Hanersun HN18-72H585W](https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18-72h585w) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/hanersun-hn18n-54ht440w/hanersun-hn18n-72ht595w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.