--- title: "GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 625 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615) | [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625) | | Manufacturer | GL Solar | GL Solar | | Power | 615 Wp | 625 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.70 % | 22.10 % | | Technology | HJT | HJT | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 615 | 625 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.70 % | 22.10 % | +0.40 pp for 625 | | Power density | 217.3 Wp/m² | 220.8 Wp/m² | +3.5 Wp/m² for 625 | | Rated power | 615 Wp | 625 Wp | +10 W for 625 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 615 | 625 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 615 Wp | 625 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.70 % | 22.10 % | | Power density | 217.3 Wp/m² | 220.8 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.44 V | 45.55 V | | Voltage at max power | 37.92 V | 38.32 V | | Short-circuit current | 17.36 A | 17.44 A | | Current at max power | 16.21 A | 16.31 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2172x1303x35 mm | 2172x1303x35 mm | | Module area | 2.830 m² | 2.830 m² | | Weight | 36.0 kg | 36.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 58.5 kg/kWp | 57.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | HJT | HJT | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 120 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 615:** 20,413 kWh - **Cumulative output, 625:** 20,745 kWh - **Gap:** 332 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 615 | 625 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 615 W | 625 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 591 W | 601 W | 96.1% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 567 W | 576 W | 92.2% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 543 W | 552 W | 88.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 615 | 625 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #7,421 | #6,012 | 14,005 | 625 leads by 1,409 places | | Power density | #7,329 | #6,022 | 14,005 | 625 leads by 1,307 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #11,776 | #11,308 | 14,005 | 625 leads by 468 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,616 | #2,801 | 14,005 | 625 leads by 815 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 or GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625? According to our database: **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625** has higher module efficiency (**22.10%** vs **21.70%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625? **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** has a module efficiency of **21.70%**, while **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625** is **22.10%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 use vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625? **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** uses **HJT** cells; **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625? **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** has a **30 years** power warranty; **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 bifacial panels? Both **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** and **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-640](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-640) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-635) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-630) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-620](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-620) - One difference: module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610) - The same specification on paper - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-610w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.