--- title: "GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 Identical on every published parameter All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610) | [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615) | | Manufacturer | GL Solar | GL Solar | | Power | 610 Wp | 615 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.60 % | 21.70 % | | Technology | HJT | HJT | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 610 | 615 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 615 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.60 % | 21.70 % | | Power density | 215.5 Wp/m² | 217.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.38 V | 45.44 V | | Voltage at max power | 37.72 V | 37.92 V | | Short-circuit current | 17.32 A | 17.36 A | | Current at max power | 16.16 A | 16.21 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2172x1303x35 mm | 2172x1303x35 mm | | Module area | 2.830 m² | 2.830 m² | | Weight | 36.0 kg | 36.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 59.0 kg/kWp | 58.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | HJT | HJT | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 120 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 610:** 20,247 kWh - **Cumulative output, 615:** 20,413 kWh - **Gap:** 166 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 610 | 615 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 610 W | 615 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 586 W | 591 W | 96.1% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 562 W | 567 W | 92.2% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 539 W | 543 W | 88.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 610 | 615 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #7,652 | #7,421 | 14,005 | 615 leads by 231 places | | Power density | #7,727 | #7,329 | 14,005 | 615 leads by 398 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #11,981 | #11,776 | 14,005 | 615 leads by 205 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,915 | #3,616 | 14,005 | 615 leads by 299 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 or GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615? According to our database: **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** has higher module efficiency (**21.70%** vs **21.60%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615? **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610** has a module efficiency of **21.60%**, while **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** is **21.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 use vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615? **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610** uses **HJT** cells; **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615? **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610** has a **30 years** power warranty; **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615 bifacial panels? Both **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610** and **GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-640](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-640) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-635) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-630) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-620](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-620) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610 vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W](https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-610w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.