--- title: "Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) GKA210N132 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.96 pp more efficient. 12 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132) | [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series) | | Manufacturer | Gamko New Energy | Gamko New Energy | | Power | 750 Wp | 720 Wp | | Efficiency | 24.14 % | 23.18 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | GKA210N132 | GKA210N132-720W (series) | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 24.14 % | 23.18 % | +0.96 pp for GKA210N132 | | Power density | 241.4 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | +9.7 Wp/m² for GKA210N132 | | Rated power | 750 Wp | 720 Wp | +30 W for GKA210N132 | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.41 V | 47.11 V | 1.30 V apart | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm | | Voltage at max power | 40.34 V | 38.91 V | 1.43 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | GKA210N132 | GKA210N132-720W (series) | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 750 Wp | 720 Wp | | Module efficiency | 24.14 % | 23.18 % | | Power density | 241.4 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.41 V | 47.11 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.34 V | 38.91 V | | Short-circuit current | 19.52 A | 19.43 A | | Current at max power | 18.59 A | 18.50 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.340 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x30 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 32.0 kg | 32.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 42.7 kg/kWp | 44.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | - | - | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, GKA210N132:** 24,894 kWh - **Cumulative output, GKA210N132-720W (series):** 23,898 kWh - **Gap:** 996 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | GKA210N132 | GKA210N132-720W (series) | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 750 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 712 W | 683 W | 94.9% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 674 W | 647 W | 89.8% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 635 W | 610 W | 84.7% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | GKA210N132 | GKA210N132-720W (series) | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #238 | #1,468 | 14,129 | GKA210N132 leads by 1,230 places | | Power density | #241 | #1,390 | 14,129 | GKA210N132 leads by 1,149 places | | Heat behaviour | #8,846 | #8,846 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #234 | #447 | 14,129 | GKA210N132 leads by 213 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #110 | #510 | 14,129 | GKA210N132 leads by 400 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 or Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)? According to our database: **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132** has higher module efficiency (**24.14%** vs **23.18%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)? **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132** has a module efficiency of **24.14%**, while **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-**720 W** (series)** is **23.18%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 use vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)? **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-**720 W** (series)** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)? **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-**720 W** (series)** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) bifacial panels? Both **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132** and **Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-**720 W** (series)** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-715W (series)](https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w-series) - The same specification on paper - [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-710W (series)](https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-710w-series) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-705W (series)](https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-705w-series) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-700W (series)](https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-700w-series) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-750](https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-750) - The same specification on paper - [Gamko New Energy GKA210N132 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-745](https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-745) - The same specification on paper --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.