--- title: "Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T E715HCBG 132-T leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 105 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t) | [Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | | Manufacturer | Emmvee | Emmvee | | Power | 610 Wp | 715 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.58 % | 23.02 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | E610HCBG132-T | E715HCBG 132-T | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 715 Wp | +105 W for E715HCBG 132-T | | Weight | 34.0 kg | 37.8 kg | -3.8 kg for E610HCBG132-T | | Module efficiency | 22.58 % | 23.02 % | +0.44 pp for E715HCBG 132-T | | Short-circuit current | 15.89 A | 18.54 A | 2.65 A apart | | Module area | 2.701 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.405 m² apart | | Power density | 225.8 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +4.3 Wp/m² for E715HCBG 132-T | | Weight per kWp | 55.7 kg/kWp | 52.9 kg/kWp | -2.9 kg/kWp for E715HCBG 132-T | | Current at max power | 15.05 A | 17.77 A | 2.72 A apart | | Dimensions | 2382x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2382x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | E610HCBG132-T | E715HCBG 132-T | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 715 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.58 % | 23.02 % | | Power density | 225.8 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.88 V | 48.46 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.59 V | 40.25 V | | Short-circuit current | 15.89 A | 18.54 A | | Current at max power | 15.05 A | 17.77 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2382x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 2.701 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 34.0 kg | 37.8 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.7 kg/kWp | 52.9 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, E610HCBG132-T:** 20,467 kWh - **Cumulative output, E715HCBG 132-T:** 23,990 kWh - **Gap:** 3,523 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | E610HCBG132-T | E715HCBG 132-T | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 610 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 583 W | 684 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 557 W | 653 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 530 W | 622 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | E610HCBG132-T | E715HCBG 132-T | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,828 | #1,797 | 14,005 | E715HCBG 132-T leads by 2,031 places | | Power density | #3,729 | #2,018 | 14,005 | E715HCBG 132-T leads by 1,711 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #10,132 | #6,576 | 14,005 | E715HCBG 132-T leads by 3,556 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,346 | #678 | 14,005 | E715HCBG 132-T leads by 2,668 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Emmvee E610HCBG132-T or Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T? According to our database: **Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T** has higher module efficiency (**23.02%** vs **22.58%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T? **Emmvee E610HCBG132-T** has a module efficiency of **22.58%**, while **Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T** is **23.02%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Emmvee E610HCBG132-T use vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T? **Emmvee E610HCBG132-T** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T? **Emmvee E610HCBG132-T** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T bifacial panels? Both **Emmvee E610HCBG132-T** and **Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) - 7 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e610hcbg132-t/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.