--- title: "Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T 9 differences, and they point both ways The largest is rated power: 115 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t) | [Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | | Manufacturer | Emmvee | Emmvee | | Power | 595 Wp | 710 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.03 % | 22.86 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | E595HCBG144-T | E710HCBG 132-T | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 595 Wp | 710 Wp | +115 W for E710HCBG 132-T | | Weight | 32.0 kg | 37.8 kg | -5.8 kg for E595HCBG144-T | | Short-circuit current | 14.55 A | 18.52 A | 3.97 A apart | | Module area | 2.583 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.523 m² apart | | Open-circuit voltage | 52.07 V | 48.32 V | 3.75 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.82 A | 17.70 A | 3.88 A apart | | Cell count | 144 | 132 | 12 cells apart | | Voltage at max power | 43.08 V | 40.13 V | 2.95 V apart | | Dimensions | 2278x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | E595HCBG144-T | E710HCBG 132-T | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 595 Wp | 710 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.03 % | 22.86 % | | Power density | 230.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 52.07 V | 48.32 V | | Voltage at max power | 43.08 V | 40.13 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.55 A | 18.52 A | | Current at max power | 13.82 A | 17.70 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2278x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 2.583 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 32.0 kg | 37.8 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | 53.2 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, E595HCBG144-T:** 19,963 kWh - **Cumulative output, E710HCBG 132-T:** 23,822 kWh - **Gap:** 3,859 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | E595HCBG144-T | E710HCBG 132-T | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 595 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 569 W | 679 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 543 W | 648 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 517 W | 617 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | E595HCBG144-T | E710HCBG 132-T | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,794 | #2,591 | 14,129 | E595HCBG144-T leads by 797 places | | Power density | #1,809 | #2,529 | 14,129 | E595HCBG144-T leads by 720 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #2,220 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #7,926 | #7,142 | 14,129 | E710HCBG 132-T leads by 784 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,384 | #869 | 14,129 | E710HCBG 132-T leads by 2,515 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Emmvee E595HCBG144-T or Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T? According to our database: **Emmvee E595HCBG144-T** has higher module efficiency (**23.03%** vs **22.86%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Emmvee E595HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T? **Emmvee E595HCBG144-T** has a module efficiency of **23.03%**, while **Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T** is **22.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Emmvee E595HCBG144-T use vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T? **Emmvee E595HCBG144-T** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Emmvee E595HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T? **Emmvee E595HCBG144-T** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Emmvee E595HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T bifacial panels? Both **Emmvee E595HCBG144-T** and **Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E595HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e595hcbg144-t/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.