--- title: "Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E530HCBG144 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E530HCBG144 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e530hcbg144" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E530HCBG144 8 differences, and they point both ways The largest is rated power: 35 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Emmvee E495HCBG132](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e495hcbg132) | [Emmvee E530HCBG144](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e530hcbg144) | | Manufacturer | Emmvee | Emmvee | | Power | 495 Wp | 530 Wp | | Efficiency | 20.82 % | 20.52 % | | Technology | PERC | PERC | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | E495HCBG132 | E530HCBG144 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 495 Wp | 530 Wp | +35 W for E530HCBG144 | | Open-circuit voltage | 44.79 V | 49.20 V | 4.41 V apart | | Module area | 2.378 m² | 2.583 m² | 0.205 m² apart | | Module efficiency | 20.82 % | 20.52 % | +0.30 pp for E495HCBG132 | | Weight | 28.0 kg | 30.0 kg | -2.0 kg for E495HCBG132 | | Cell count | 132 | 144 | 12 cells apart | | Dimensions | 2097x1134x35 mm | 2278x1134x35 mm | 2097x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm | | Voltage at max power | 39.14 V | 41.10 V | 1.96 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | E495HCBG132 | E530HCBG144 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 495 Wp | 530 Wp | | Module efficiency | 20.82 % | 20.52 % | | Power density | 208.2 Wp/m² | 205.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 44.79 V | 49.20 V | | Voltage at max power | 39.14 V | 41.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.15 A | 13.56 A | | Current at max power | 12.65 A | 12.90 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.350 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2097x1134x35 mm | 2278x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.378 m² | 2.583 m² | | Weight | 28.0 kg | 30.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.45 %/yr | 0.45 %/yr | | Cell technology | PERC | PERC | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, E495HCBG132:** 16,301 kWh - **Cumulative output, E530HCBG144:** 17,453 kWh - **Gap:** 1,152 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | E495HCBG132 | E530HCBG144 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 495 W | 530 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 469 W | 502 W | 94.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 443 W | 474 W | 89.5% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 417 W | 447 W | 84.2% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | E495HCBG132 | E530HCBG144 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #10,443 | #11,244 | 14,005 | E495HCBG132 leads by 801 places | | Power density | #10,454 | #11,255 | 14,005 | E495HCBG132 leads by 801 places | | Heat behaviour | #10,419 | #10,419 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #10,720 | #10,740 | 14,005 | E495HCBG132 leads by 20 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #9,479 | #8,701 | 14,005 | E530HCBG144 leads by 778 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Emmvee E495HCBG132 or Emmvee E530HCBG144? According to our database: **Emmvee E495HCBG132** has higher module efficiency (**20.82%** vs **20.52%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Emmvee E495HCBG132 and Emmvee E530HCBG144? **Emmvee E495HCBG132** has a module efficiency of **20.82%**, while **Emmvee E530HCBG144** is **20.52%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Emmvee E495HCBG132 use vs Emmvee E530HCBG144? **Emmvee E495HCBG132** uses **PERC** cells; **Emmvee E530HCBG144** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Emmvee E495HCBG132 and Emmvee E530HCBG144? **Emmvee E495HCBG132** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Emmvee E530HCBG144** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Emmvee E495HCBG132 and Emmvee E530HCBG144 bifacial panels? Both **Emmvee E495HCBG132** and **Emmvee E530HCBG144** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E550HCBG144](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e550hcbg144) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E545HCBG144](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e545hcbg144) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E540HCBG144](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e540hcbg144) - 7 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E535HCBG144](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e535hcbg144) - 7 differences, the largest is rated power - [Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E500HCBG132](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e500hcbg132) - One difference: module efficiency - [Emmvee E495HCBG132 vs Emmvee E490HCBG132](https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e490hcbg132) - One difference: module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/emmvee-e495hcbg132/emmvee-e530hcbg144 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.