---
title: "EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-575nt72-hl-bf-dg"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-575nt72-hl-bf-dg.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG

575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv) | [EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-575nt72-hl-bf-dg) |
| Manufacturer | EGing PV | EGing PV |
| Power | 565 Wp | 575 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.87 % | 22.25 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 565NT72-HLV | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG |
| Weight | 27.0 kg | 31.7 kg | -4.7 kg for 565NT72-HLV |
| Weight per kWp | 47.8 kg/kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp | -7.3 kg/kWp for 565NT72-HLV |
| Module efficiency | 21.87 % | 22.25 % | +0.38 pp for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG |
| Power density | 218.7 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² | +3.9 Wp/m² for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG |
| Rated power | 565 Wp | 575 Wp | +10 W for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 565NT72-HLV | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 565 Wp | 575 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.87 % | 22.25 % |
| Power density | 218.7 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.85 V | 51.24 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.98 V | 42.53 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.25 A | 14.31 A |
| Current at max power | 13.46 A | 13.52 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2278x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.583 m² | 2.583 m² |
| Weight | 27.0 kg | 31.7 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 47.8 kg/kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 144 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 565NT72-HLV:** 18,957 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 575NT72-HL/BF-DG:** 19,292 kWh
- **Gap:** 335 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 565NT72-HLV | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 565 W | 575 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 540 W | 549 W | 95.5% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 514 W | 523 W | 91.0% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 489 W | 497 W | 86.5% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 565NT72-HLV | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #6,971 | #5,752 | 14,129 | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,219 places |
| Power density | #6,904 | #5,612 | 14,129 | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,292 places |
| Heat behaviour | #6,152 | #6,152 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #1,908 | #9,652 | 14,129 | 565NT72-HLV leads by 7,744 places |
| Warranty | #9,912 | #21 | 14,129 | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 9,891 places |
| Overall | #6,723 | #4,996 | 14,129 | 575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,727 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV or EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG?

According to our database: **EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG** has higher module efficiency (**22.25%** vs **21.87%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV and EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG?

**EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV** has a module efficiency of **21.87%**, while **EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG** is **22.25%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV use vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG?

**EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV** uses **TOPCon** cells; **EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV and EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG?

**EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV** has a **25 years** power warranty; **EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV and EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG bifacial panels?

**EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-580NT72-HLV](https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-580nt72-hlv) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-580nt72-hl-bf-dg) - 7 differences, the largest is performance warranty
- [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HLV](https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-575nt72-hlv) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-570NT72-HL/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-570nt72-hl-bf-dg) - 4 differences, the largest is performance warranty
- [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-570NT72-HLV](https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-570nt72-hlv) - The same specification on paper
- [EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hl-bf-dg) - 4 differences, the largest is performance warranty


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/eging-pv-eg-565nt72-hlv/eging-pv-eg-575nt72-hl-bf-dg

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

