--- title: "Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W 144M10FL 520W leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 35 W more power. 12 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w) | [Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w) | | Manufacturer | Daxieworld | Daxieworld | | Power | 485 Wp | 520 Wp | | Efficiency | 19.77 % | 19.54 % | | Technology | PERC | PERC | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 132M10FL 485W | 144M10FL 520W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 485 Wp | 520 Wp | +35 W for 144M10FL 520W | | Module area | 2.453 m² | 2.662 m² | 0.209 m² apart | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.16 V | 48.94 V | 3.78 V apart | | Module efficiency | 19.77 % | 19.54 % | +0.23 pp for 132M10FL 485W | | Voltage at max power | 37.95 V | 41.03 V | 3.08 V apart | | Dimensions | 2246x1092x3 mm | 2246x1185x3 mm | 2246x1092x3 mm vs 2246x1185x3 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 132M10FL 485W | 144M10FL 520W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 485 Wp | 520 Wp | | Module efficiency | 19.77 % | 19.54 % | | Power density | 197.7 Wp/m² | 195.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.16 V | 48.94 V | | Voltage at max power | 37.95 V | 41.03 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.78 A | 13.64 A | | Current at max power | 12.79 A | 12.67 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.370 %/°C | -0.370 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2246x1092x3 mm | 2246x1185x3 mm | | Module area | 2.453 m² | 2.662 m² | | Weight | 7.4 kg | 8.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 15.3 kg/kWp | 15.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Annual degradation | - | - | | Cell technology | PERC | PERC | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 108 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 132M10FL 485W:** 16,273 kWh - **Cumulative output, 144M10FL 520W:** 17,447 kWh - **Gap:** 1,174 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 132M10FL 485W | 144M10FL 520W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 485 W | 520 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 458 W | 491 W | 94.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 431 W | 462 W | 88.9% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 404 W | 433 W | 83.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 132M10FL 485W | 144M10FL 520W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #12,478 | #12,649 | 14,005 | 132M10FL 485W leads by 171 places | | Power density | #12,422 | #12,632 | 14,005 | 132M10FL 485W leads by 210 places | | Heat behaviour | #13,081 | #13,081 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #21 | #24 | 14,005 | 132M10FL 485W leads by 3 places | | Warranty | #9,798 | #9,798 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #9,733 | #9,088 | 14,005 | 144M10FL 520W leads by 645 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W or Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W? According to our database: **Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **485 W**** has higher module efficiency (**19.77%** vs **19.54%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W? **Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **485 W**** has a module efficiency of **19.77%**, while **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **520 W**** is **19.54%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W use vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W? **Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **485 W**** uses **PERC** cells; **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **520 W**** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W? **Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **485 W**** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **520 W**** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-535w) - 7 differences, the largest is rated power - [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-530w) - 6 differences, the largest is rated power - [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w) - 6 differences, the largest is rated power - [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-480w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-475w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.