---
title: "Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W

144M10FL 525W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 55 W more power. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w) | [Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w) |
| Manufacturer | Daxieworld | Daxieworld |
| Power | 470 Wp | 525 Wp |
| Efficiency | 19.16 % | 19.73 % |
| Technology | Flexible | Flexible |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 132M10FL 470W | 144M10FL 525W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 470 Wp | 525 Wp | +55 W for 144M10FL 525W |
| Module efficiency | 19.16 % | 19.73 % | +0.57 pp for 144M10FL 525W |
| Open-circuit voltage | 44.71 V | 49.09 V | 4.38 V apart |
| Module area | 2.453 m² | 2.662 m² | 0.209 m² apart |
| Power density | 191.6 Wp/m² | 197.3 Wp/m² | +5.6 Wp/m² for 144M10FL 525W |
| Voltage at max power | 37.44 V | 41.21 V | 3.77 V apart |
| Dimensions | 2246x1092x3 mm | 2246x1185x3 mm | 2246x1092x3 mm vs 2246x1185x3 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 132M10FL 470W | 144M10FL 525W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 470 Wp | 525 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 19.16 % | 19.73 % |
| Power density | 191.6 Wp/m² | 197.3 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 44.71 V | 49.09 V |
| Voltage at max power | 37.44 V | 41.21 V |
| Short-circuit current | 13.60 A | 13.70 A |
| Current at max power | 12.57 A | 12.75 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.370 %/°C | -0.370 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2246x1092x3 mm | 2246x1185x3 mm |
| Module area | 2.453 m² | 2.662 m² |
| Weight | 7.4 kg | 8.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 15.7 kg/kWp | 15.2 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Annual degradation | - | - |
| Cell technology | Flexible | Flexible |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 108 |
| Bifacial | No | No |


## Thirty-year yield

A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 132M10FL 470W:** 15,769 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 144M10FL 525W:** 17,615 kWh
- **Gap:** 1,846 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 132M10FL 470W | 144M10FL 525W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 470 W | 525 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 444 W | 496 W | 94.5% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 418 W | 467 W | 88.9% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 392 W | 438 W | 83.3% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 132M10FL 470W | 144M10FL 525W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #12,889 | #12,495 | 14,005 | 144M10FL 525W leads by 394 places |
| Power density | #12,866 | #12,489 | 14,005 | 144M10FL 525W leads by 377 places |
| Heat behaviour | #13,081 | #13,081 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #39 | #20 | 14,005 | 144M10FL 525W leads by 19 places |
| Warranty | #9,798 | #9,798 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #10,503 | #8,684 | 14,005 | 144M10FL 525W leads by 1,819 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W or Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?

According to our database: **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **525 W**** has higher module efficiency (**19.73%** vs **19.16%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?

**Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **470 W**** has a module efficiency of **19.16%**, while **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **525 W**** is **19.73%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W use vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?

**Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **470 W**** uses Flexible cells; **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **525 W**** uses Flexible. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?

**Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL **470 W**** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL **525 W**** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


## Related comparisons

- [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-535w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-530w) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-480w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W](https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-475w) - One difference: module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

