--- title: "DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh156na-625w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W DH132NC-710 leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | [DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-625w) | | Manufacturer | DAS Solar | DAS Solar | | Power | 710 Wp | 625 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.90 % | 22.40 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | DH132NC-710 | DH156NA-625W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 710 Wp | 625 Wp | +85 W for DH132NC-710 | | Module efficiency | 22.90 % | 22.40 % | +0.50 pp for DH132NC-710 | | Weight | 38.3 kg | 34.3 kg | -4.0 kg for DH156NA-625W | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.020 %/°C for DH132NC-710 | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.92 V | 55.74 V | 6.82 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 18.42 A | 14.27 A | 4.15 A apart | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.795 m² | 0.311 m² apart | | Power density | 228.6 Wp/m² | 223.6 Wp/m² | +5.0 Wp/m² for DH132NC-710 | | Voltage at max power | 40.81 V | 46.09 V | 5.28 V apart | | Current at max power | 17.40 A | 13.56 A | 3.84 A apart | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2465x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | DH132NC-710 | DH156NA-625W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 710 Wp | 625 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.90 % | 22.40 % | | Power density | 228.6 Wp/m² | 223.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.92 V | 55.74 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.81 V | 46.09 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.42 A | 14.27 A | | Current at max power | 17.40 A | 13.56 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2465x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.795 m² | | Weight | 38.3 kg | 34.3 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp | 54.9 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | - | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, DH132NC-710:** 23,822 kWh - **Cumulative output, DH156NA-625W:** 20,970 kWh - **Gap:** 2,852 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | DH132NC-710 | DH156NA-625W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 710 W | 625 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 680 W | 597 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 650 W | 569 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 621 W | 541 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | DH132NC-710 | DH156NA-625W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #2,359 | #4,774 | 14,005 | DH132NC-710 leads by 2,415 places | | Power density | #2,474 | #4,955 | 14,005 | DH132NC-710 leads by 2,481 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #6,093 | 14,005 | DH132NC-710 leads by 4,784 places | | Weight | #8,122 | #9,266 | 14,005 | DH132NC-710 leads by 1,144 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #576 | #2,472 | 14,005 | DH132NC-710 leads by 1,896 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 or DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W? According to our database: **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710** has higher module efficiency (**22.90%** vs **22.40%**); **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.280%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W? **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710** has a module efficiency of **22.90%**, while **DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-**625 W**** is **22.40%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W? **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710** uses **TOPCon** cells; **DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-**625 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W? **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710** has a **30 years** power warranty; **DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-**625 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W bifacial panels? Both **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710** and **DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-**625 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh132nc-715) - The same specification on paper - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh132nc-705) - One difference: module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh132nc-700) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh132ne-645w) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710/das-solar-das-dh156na-625w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.