--- title: "DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W DH132NE-650W leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.70 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695) | [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w) | | Manufacturer | DAS Solar | DAS Solar | | Power | 695 Wp | 650 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.40 % | 24.10 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | DH132NC-695 | DH132NE-650W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.40 % | 24.10 % | +1.70 pp for DH132NE-650W | | Rated power | 695 Wp | 650 Wp | +45 W for DH132NC-695 | | Power density | 223.7 Wp/m² | 240.6 Wp/m² | +16.9 Wp/m² for DH132NE-650W | | Weight | 38.3 kg | 31.9 kg | -6.4 kg for DH132NE-650W | | Weight per kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp | 49.1 kg/kWp | -6.0 kg/kWp for DH132NE-650W | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.701 m² | 0.405 m² apart | | Short-circuit current | 18.30 A | 16.47 A | 1.83 A apart | | Current at max power | 17.28 A | 15.67 A | 1.61 A apart | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.32 V | 49.38 V | 1.06 V apart | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm | | Voltage at max power | 40.23 V | 41.49 V | 1.26 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | DH132NC-695 | DH132NE-650W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 695 Wp | 650 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.40 % | 24.10 % | | Power density | 223.7 Wp/m² | 240.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.32 V | 49.38 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.23 V | 41.49 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.30 A | 16.47 A | | Current at max power | 17.28 A | 15.67 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.701 m² | | Weight | 38.3 kg | 31.9 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp | 49.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, DH132NC-695:** 23,319 kWh - **Cumulative output, DH132NE-650W:** 21,809 kWh - **Gap:** 1,510 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | DH132NC-695 | DH132NE-650W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 695 W | 650 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 666 W | 623 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 637 W | 595 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 607 W | 568 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | DH132NC-695 | DH132NE-650W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #4,774 | #219 | 14,005 | DH132NE-650W leads by 4,555 places | | Power density | #4,877 | #233 | 14,005 | DH132NE-650W leads by 4,644 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,532 | #2,720 | 14,005 | DH132NE-650W leads by 6,812 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #1,084 | #878 | 14,005 | DH132NE-650W leads by 206 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W? According to our database: **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-**650 W**** has higher module efficiency (**24.10%** vs **22.40%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W? **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** has a module efficiency of **22.40%**, while **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-**650 W**** is **24.10%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W? **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** uses **TOPCon** cells; **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-**650 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W? **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** has a **30 years** power warranty; **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-**650 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W bifacial panels? Both **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** and **DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-**650 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132nc-715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132nc-705) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132nc-700) - The same specification on paper - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132ne-645w) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-640W](https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132ne-640w) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.