--- title: "DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 Identical on every published parameter All 18 comparable parameters agree, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695) | [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | | Manufacturer | DAH Solar | DAH Solar | | Power | 695 Wp | 700 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.40 % | 22.50 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 695 | 700 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 695 Wp | 700 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.40 % | 22.50 % | | Power density | 223.7 Wp/m² | 225.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.32 V | 48.52 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.23 V | 40.42 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.30 A | 18.34 A | | Current at max power | 17.28 A | 17.32 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 38.3 kg | 38.3 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.1 kg/kWp | 54.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | - | - | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 695:** 23,319 kWh - **Cumulative output, 700:** 23,486 kWh - **Gap:** 167 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 695 | 700 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 695 W | 700 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 666 W | 671 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 637 W | 641 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 607 W | 612 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 695 | 700 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #4,834 | #4,281 | 14,129 | 700 leads by 553 places | | Power density | #4,939 | #4,048 | 14,129 | 700 leads by 891 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,347 | #1,347 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,615 | #9,185 | 14,129 | 700 leads by 430 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #1,098 | #958 | 14,129 | 700 leads by 140 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 or DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700? According to our database: **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700** has higher module efficiency (**22.50%** vs **22.40%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700? **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** has a module efficiency of **22.40%**, while **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700** is **22.50%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 use vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700? **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** uses **TOPCon** cells; **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700? **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** has a **30 years** power warranty; **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 bifacial panels? Both **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695** and **DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-695/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.