---
title: "DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-450"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450

450 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.75 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435) | [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-450) |
| Manufacturer | DAH Solar | DAH Solar |
| Power | 435 Wp | 450 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.77 % | 22.52 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 435 | 450 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.77 % | 22.52 % | +0.75 pp for 450 |
| Power density | 217.7 Wp/m² | 225.2 Wp/m² | +7.5 Wp/m² for 450 |
| Rated power | 435 Wp | 450 Wp | +15 W for 450 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 435 | 450 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 435 Wp | 450 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.77 % | 22.52 % |
| Power density | 217.7 Wp/m² | 225.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 35.40 V | 36.00 V |
| Voltage at max power | 30.00 V | 30.60 V |
| Short-circuit current | 15.46 A | 15.64 A |
| Current at max power | 14.50 A | 14.71 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² |
| Weight | 23.9 kg | 23.9 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 54.9 kg/kWp | 53.1 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 96 | 96 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 435:** 14,595 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 450:** 15,098 kWh
- **Gap:** 503 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 435 | 450 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 435 W | 450 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 416 W | 430 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 397 W | 411 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 378 W | 391 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 435 | 450 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #7,233 | #4,108 | 14,005 | 450 leads by 3,125 places |
| Power density | #7,066 | #4,225 | 14,005 | 450 leads by 2,841 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #9,316 | #6,893 | 14,005 | 450 leads by 2,423 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #7,712 | #6,157 | 14,005 | 450 leads by 1,555 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 or DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450?

According to our database: **DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450** has higher module efficiency (**22.52%** vs **21.77%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 and DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450?

**DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435** has a module efficiency of **21.77%**, while **DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450** is **22.52%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 use vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450?

**DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435** uses **TOPCon** cells; **DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 and DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450?

**DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435** has a **30 years** power warranty; **DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 and DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450 bifacial panels?

Both **DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435** and **DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-450** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-455](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-455) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-445](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-445) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-440](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-440) - One difference: module efficiency
- [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-430](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-430) - One difference: module efficiency
- [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-425](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-425) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [DAH Solar DHN-48Z16/DG(BW)-435 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-435/dah-dhn-48z16-dg-bw-450

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

