--- title: "Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chsm72n-hc-600" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600 600 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585) | [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm72n-hc-600) | | Manufacturer | Astronergy | Astronergy | | Power | 585 Wp | 600 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.60 % | 23.20 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 585 | 600 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.60 % | 23.20 % | +0.60 pp for 600 | | Power density | 226.5 Wp/m² | 232.3 Wp/m² | +5.8 Wp/m² for 600 | | Rated power | 585 Wp | 600 Wp | +15 W for 600 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 585 | 600 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 585 Wp | 600 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.60 % | 23.20 % | | Power density | 226.5 Wp/m² | 232.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 51.30 V | 51.75 V | | Voltage at max power | 42.75 V | 43.13 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.40 A | 14.69 A | | Current at max power | 13.68 A | 13.91 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2278x1134x35 mm | 2278x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.583 m² | 2.583 m² | | Weight | 26.9 kg | 26.9 kg | | Weight per kWp | 46.0 kg/kWp | 44.8 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 144 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 585:** 19,628 kWh - **Cumulative output, 600:** 20,131 kWh - **Gap:** 503 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 585 | 600 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 585 W | 600 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 560 W | 574 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 534 W | 548 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 509 W | 522 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 585 | 600 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,658 | #1,306 | 14,005 | 600 leads by 2,352 places | | Power density | #3,500 | #1,252 | 14,005 | 600 leads by 2,248 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #947 | #556 | 14,005 | 600 leads by 391 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,037 | #2,846 | 14,005 | 600 leads by 1,191 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 or Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600? According to our database: **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600** has higher module efficiency (**23.20%** vs **22.60%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600? **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585** has a module efficiency of **22.60%**, while **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600** is **23.20%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 use vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600? **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600? **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-605](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chsm72n-hc-605) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chsm72n-hc-595) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-590](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chsm72n-hc-590) - One difference: module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-580](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-580) - The same specification on paper - [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-575) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-570) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-585/astronergy-chsm72n-hc-600 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.