---
title: "Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-575"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575

CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-575) |
| Manufacturer | Astronergy | Astronergy |
| Power | 720 Wp | 575 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.20 % | 22.30 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 | CHSM72N-HC-575 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.20 % | 22.30 % | +0.90 pp for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 |
| Rated power | 720 Wp | 575 Wp | +145 W for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 |
| Power density | 231.8 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² | +9.2 Wp/m² for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 |
| Weight | 38.0 kg | 26.9 kg | -11.1 kg for CHSM72N-HC-575 |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 12 yrs | +3 yrs for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 |
| Weight per kWp | 52.8 kg/kWp | 46.8 kg/kWp | -6.0 kg/kWp for CHSM72N-HC-575 |
| Short-circuit current | 18.58 A | 14.20 A | 4.38 A apart |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.583 m² | 0.523 m² apart |
| Current at max power | 17.64 A | 13.53 A | 4.11 A apart |
| Cell count | 132 | 144 | 12 cells apart |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.17 V | 51.00 V | 1.83 V apart |
| Bifacial | Yes | No | Yes vs No |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2278x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm |
| Voltage at max power | 40.81 V | 42.50 V | 1.69 V apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 | CHSM72N-HC-575 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 720 Wp | 575 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.20 % | 22.30 % |
| Power density | 231.8 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.17 V | 51.00 V |
| Voltage at max power | 40.81 V | 42.50 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.58 A | 14.20 A |
| Current at max power | 17.64 A | 13.53 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2278x1134x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.583 m² |
| Weight | 38.0 kg | 26.9 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 52.8 kg/kWp | 46.8 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 144 |
| Bifacial | Yes | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720:** 24,157 kWh
- **Cumulative output, CHSM72N-HC-575:** 19,292 kWh
- **Gap:** 4,865 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 | CHSM72N-HC-575 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 720 W | 575 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 689 W | 550 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 657 W | 525 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 626 W | 500 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 | CHSM72N-HC-575 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,306 | #5,100 | 14,005 | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 leads by 3,794 places |
| Power density | #1,347 | #5,549 | 14,005 | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 leads by 4,202 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #6,459 | #1,352 | 14,005 | CHSM72N-HC-575 leads by 5,107 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #339 | #4,770 | 14,005 | CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 leads by 4,431 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 or Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575?

According to our database: **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720** has higher module efficiency (**23.20%** vs **22.30%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575?

**Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720** has a module efficiency of **23.20%**, while **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575** is **22.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 use vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575?

**Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575?

**Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575 bifacial panels?

**Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) - The same specification on paper
- [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-580](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-575/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-580) - One difference: module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm72n-hc-575

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.