--- title: "Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735 735 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | | Manufacturer | Astronergy | Astronergy | | Power | 710 Wp | 735 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.90 % | 23.70 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 710 | 735 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.90 % | 23.70 % | +0.80 pp for 735 | | Power density | 228.6 Wp/m² | 236.6 Wp/m² | +8.0 Wp/m² for 735 | | Rated power | 710 Wp | 735 Wp | +25 W for 735 | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.77 V | 49.77 V | 1.00 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 710 | 735 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 710 Wp | 735 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.90 % | 23.70 % | | Power density | 228.6 Wp/m² | 236.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.77 V | 49.77 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.48 V | 41.41 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.48 A | 18.72 A | | Current at max power | 17.54 A | 17.75 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 38.0 kg | 38.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp | 51.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 710:** 23,822 kWh - **Cumulative output, 735:** 24,661 kWh - **Gap:** 839 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 710 | 735 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 710 W | 735 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 679 W | 703 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 648 W | 671 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 617 W | 639 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 710 | 735 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #2,359 | #517 | 14,005 | 735 leads by 1,842 places | | Power density | #2,474 | #582 | 14,005 | 735 leads by 1,892 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #7,492 | #5,081 | 14,005 | 735 leads by 2,411 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #576 | #160 | 14,005 | 735 leads by 416 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 or Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735? According to our database: **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735** has higher module efficiency (**23.70%** vs **22.90%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735? **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710** has a module efficiency of **22.90%**, while **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735** is **23.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 use vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735? **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735? **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735 bifacial panels? Both **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710** and **Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) - The same specification on paper - [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) - One difference: module efficiency - [Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.