---
title: "Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/jinko-solar-js182mhc120-455"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/jinko-solar-js182mhc120-455.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455

CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.48 pp more efficient. 2 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450) | [Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-js182mhc120-455) |
| Manufacturer | Astronergy | Jinko Solar |
| Power | 450 Wp | 455 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.50 % | 21.02 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | PERC |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | JS182MHC120-455 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 21.02 % | +1.48 pp for CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C | +0.050 %/°C for CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 |
| Power density | 225.2 Wp/m² | 210.2 Wp/m² | +15.0 Wp/m² for CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 25 yrs | +5 yrs for CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 |
| Open-circuit voltage | 36.59 V | 41.60 V | 5.01 V apart |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.165 m² | 0.167 m² apart |
| Short-circuit current | 15.61 A | 13.73 A | 1.88 A apart |
| Weight per kWp | 54.4 kg/kWp | 50.5 kg/kWp | -3.9 kg/kWp for JS182MHC120-455 |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | PERC | TOPCon vs PERC |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 23.0 kg | -1.5 kg for JS182MHC120-455 |
| Voltage at max power | 30.51 V | 34.90 V | 4.39 V apart |
| Cell count | 96 | 120 | 24 cells apart |
| Current at max power | 14.75 A | 13.02 A | 1.73 A apart |
| Bifacial | Yes | No | Yes vs No |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1909x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | JS182MHC120-455 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 450 Wp | 455 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 21.02 % |
| Power density | 225.2 Wp/m² | 210.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 36.59 V | 41.60 V |
| Voltage at max power | 30.51 V | 34.90 V |
| Short-circuit current | 15.61 A | 13.73 A |
| Current at max power | 14.75 A | 13.02 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1909x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.165 m² |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 23.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 54.4 kg/kWp | 50.5 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | - |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | - |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | PERC |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 96 | 120 |
| Bifacial | Yes | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450:** 15,098 kWh
- **Cumulative output, JS182MHC120-455:** 15,102 kWh
- **Gap:** 4 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | JS182MHC120-455 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 450 W | 455 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 430 W | 432 W | 94.9% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 411 W | 409 W | 89.8% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 391 W | 385 W | 84.7% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | JS182MHC120-455 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #4,281 | #9,766 | 14,129 | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 leads by 5,485 places |
| Power density | #4,284 | #9,810 | 14,129 | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 leads by 5,526 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #8,846 | 14,129 | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 leads by 6,626 places |
| Weight | #8,835 | #3,947 | 14,129 | JS182MHC120-455 leads by 4,888 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #9,912 | 14,129 | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 leads by 9,891 places |
| Overall | #6,286 | #12,190 | 14,129 | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 leads by 5,904 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455?

According to our database: **Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** has higher module efficiency (**22.50%** vs **21.02%**); **Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.290%/°C** vs **-0.340%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** has a module efficiency of **22.50%**, while **Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455** is **21.02%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455 bifacial panels?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-455** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-530](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-530) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-525) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-520](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-520) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-515) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-510) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-470](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-470) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/jinko-solar-js182mhc120-455

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.