---
title: "Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-525"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525

CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450) | [Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-525) |
| Manufacturer | Astronergy | Astronergy |
| Power | 450 Wp | 525 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.60 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.60 % | +1.10 pp for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 |
| Rated power | 450 Wp | 525 Wp | +75 W for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 |
| Power density | 225.2 Wp/m² | 236.1 Wp/m² | +10.9 Wp/m² for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 |
| Open-circuit voltage | 36.59 V | 41.49 V | 4.90 V apart |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.224 m² | 0.226 m² apart |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 26.9 kg | -2.4 kg for CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 |
| Weight per kWp | 54.4 kg/kWp | 51.2 kg/kWp | -3.2 kg/kWp for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 |
| Voltage at max power | 30.51 V | 34.52 V | 4.01 V apart |
| Cell count | 96 | 108 | 12 cells apart |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1961x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 450 Wp | 525 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.60 % |
| Power density | 225.2 Wp/m² | 236.1 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 36.59 V | 41.49 V |
| Voltage at max power | 30.51 V | 34.52 V |
| Short-circuit current | 15.61 A | 15.93 A |
| Current at max power | 14.75 A | 15.21 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1961x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.224 m² |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 26.9 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 54.4 kg/kWp | 51.2 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 96 | 108 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450:** 15,098 kWh
- **Cumulative output, CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525:** 17,615 kWh
- **Gap:** 2,517 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 450 W | 525 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 430 W | 502 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 411 W | 479 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 391 W | 456 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #4,222 | #627 | 14,005 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 3,595 places |
| Power density | #4,225 | #645 | 14,005 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 3,580 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #8,755 | #4,630 | 14,005 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 4,125 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,225 | #2,432 | 14,005 | CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 3,793 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 or Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?

According to our database: **Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525** has higher module efficiency (**23.60%** vs **22.50%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** has a module efficiency of **22.50%**, while **Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525** is **23.60%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 use vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?

**Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 bifacial panels?

Both **Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450** and **Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-530](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-530) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-520](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-520) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-515) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-510) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-470](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-470) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-465](https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-465) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm48rn-dg-blh-f-bh-450/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm54rn-dg-f-bh-525

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.