---
title: "AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-solar-aiko-a465-mah54db/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/aiko-solar-aiko-a465-mah54db/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)

HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 5 yrs longer. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-solar-aiko-a465-mah54db) | [Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) |
| Manufacturer | AIKO | Hyundai |
| Power | 465 Wp | 460 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.00 % |
| Technology | Back Contact | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | AIKO-A465-MAH54Db | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C | +0.020 %/°C for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 21.6 kg | -2.9 kg for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) |
| Weight per kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | 47.0 kg/kWp | -5.7 kg/kWp for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.12 V | 36.92 V | 4.20 V apart |
| Module efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.00 % | +0.30 pp for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db |
| Short-circuit current | 14.29 A | 15.75 A | 1.46 A apart |
| Cell technology | Back Contact | HJT | Back Contact vs HJT |
| Power density | 233.4 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +3.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db |
| Cell count | 108 | 96 | 12 cells apart |
| Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) |
| Voltage at max power | 34.68 V | 31.05 V | 3.63 V apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Current at max power | 13.41 A | 14.82 A | 1.41 A apart |
| Dimensions | 1757x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1757x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | AIKO-A465-MAH54Db | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 465 Wp | 460 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.00 % |
| Power density | 233.4 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.12 V | 36.92 V |
| Voltage at max power | 34.68 V | 31.05 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.29 A | 15.75 A |
| Current at max power | 13.41 A | 14.82 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1757x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.992 m² | 1.998 m² |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 21.6 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | 47.0 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr |
| Cell technology | Back Contact | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 96 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, AIKO-A465-MAH54Db:** 15,723 kWh
- **Cumulative output, HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB):** 15,674 kWh
- **Gap:** 49 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | AIKO-A465-MAH54Db | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 465 W | 460 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 447 W | 443 W | 96.1% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 429 W | 427 W | 92.2% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 411 W | 410 W | 88.3% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | AIKO-A465-MAH54Db | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,057 | #1,970 | 14,129 | AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads by 913 places |
| Power density | #1,028 | #1,927 | 14,129 | AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads by 899 places |
| Heat behaviour | #515 | #13 | 14,129 | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads by 502 places |
| Weight | #6,371 | #1,421 | 14,129 | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads by 4,950 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #4,834 | #4,242 | 14,129 | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads by 592 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db or Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?

According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db** has higher module efficiency (**23.30%** vs **23.00%**); **Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.240%/°C** vs **-0.260%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?

**AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db** has a module efficiency of **23.30%**, while **Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)** is **23.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db use vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?

**AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db** uses **Back Contact** cells; **Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?

**AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) bifacial panels?

**Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MAH54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-solar-aiko-a465-mah54db/aiko-solar-aiko-a470-mah54db) - One difference: module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MAH54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-solar-aiko-a465-mah54db/aiko-solar-aiko-a460-mah54db) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H455LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb/hyundai-hit-h455le-fb-zb) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb/hyundai-hit-h450le-fb-zb) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H445LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb/hyundai-hit-h445le-fb-zb) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H440LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/compare/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb/hyundai-hit-h440le-fb-zb) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-solar-aiko-a465-mah54db/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.