--- title: "AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO M535M-144 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO M535M-144 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-m535m-144" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-m535m-144.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO M535M-144 M535M-144 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AIKO M530M-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-m530m-144) | [AIKO M535M-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-m535m-144) | | Manufacturer | AIKO | AIKO | | Power | 530 Wp | 535 Wp | | Efficiency | 20.50 % | 20.70 % | | Technology | PERC | PERC | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | M530M-144 | M535M-144 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 20.50 % | 20.70 % | +0.20 pp for M535M-144 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | M530M-144 | M535M-144 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 530 Wp | 535 Wp | | Module efficiency | 20.50 % | 20.70 % | | Power density | 205.1 Wp/m² | 207.0 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.50 V | 49.60 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.70 V | 41.80 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.44 A | 13.53 A | | Current at max power | 12.71 A | 12.80 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.360 %/°C | -0.360 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2279x1134x35 mm | 2279x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.584 m² | 2.584 m² | | Weight | 29.0 kg | 29.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 54.7 kg/kWp | 54.2 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.55 %/yr | | Cell technology | PERC | PERC | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 144 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.360 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, M530M-144:** 17,177 kWh - **Cumulative output, M535M-144:** 17,339 kWh - **Gap:** 162 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | M530M-144 | M535M-144 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 530 W | 535 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 501 W | 506 W | 94.6% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 473 W | 477 W | 89.2% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 444 W | 448 W | 83.8% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | M530M-144 | M535M-144 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #11,389 | #10,842 | 14,129 | M535M-144 leads by 547 places | | Power density | #11,402 | #10,927 | 14,129 | M535M-144 leads by 475 places | | Heat behaviour | #12,425 | #12,425 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,198 | #8,510 | 14,129 | M535M-144 leads by 688 places | | Warranty | #9,912 | #9,912 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #9,717 | #9,380 | 14,129 | M535M-144 leads by 337 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AIKO M530M-144 or AIKO M535M-144? According to our database: **AIKO M535M-144** has higher module efficiency (**20.70%** vs **20.50%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AIKO M530M-144 and AIKO M535M-144? **AIKO M530M-144** has a module efficiency of **20.50%**, while **AIKO M535M-144** is **20.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AIKO M530M-144 use vs AIKO M535M-144? **AIKO M530M-144** uses **PERC** cells; **AIKO M535M-144** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AIKO M530M-144 and AIKO M535M-144? **AIKO M530M-144** has a **25 years** power warranty; **AIKO M535M-144** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO M550M-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-m550m-144) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO M545M-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-m545m-144) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO M540M-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-m540m-144) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) - 17 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) - 17 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO M530M-144 vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) - 17 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-m530m-144/aiko-m535m-144 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.