--- title: "AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g655-mch72mw" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw G655-MCH72Mw leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw) | [AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-g655-mch72mw) | | Manufacturer | AIKO | AIKO | | Power | 635 Wp | 655 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.50 % | 24.20 % | | Technology | Back Contact | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | G635-MCH72Mw | G655-MCH72Mw | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.50 % | 24.20 % | +0.70 pp for G655-MCH72Mw | | Power density | 235.1 Wp/m² | 242.5 Wp/m² | +7.4 Wp/m² for G655-MCH72Mw | | Rated power | 635 Wp | 655 Wp | +20 W for G655-MCH72Mw | | Cell technology | Back Contact | N-type | Back Contact vs N-type | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | G635-MCH72Mw | G655-MCH72Mw | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 635 Wp | 655 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.50 % | 24.20 % | | Power density | 235.1 Wp/m² | 242.5 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 54.10 V | 54.50 V | | Voltage at max power | 44.80 V | 45.20 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.94 A | 15.18 A | | Current at max power | 14.18 A | 14.50 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2382x1134x30 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 2.701 m² | 2.701 m² | | Weight | 31.5 kg | 31.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 49.6 kg/kWp | 48.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr | | Cell technology | Back Contact | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 144 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, G635-MCH72Mw:** 21,471 kWh - **Cumulative output, G655-MCH72Mw:** 22,148 kWh - **Gap:** 677 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | G635-MCH72Mw | G655-MCH72Mw | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 635 W | 655 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 610 W | 629 W | 96.1% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 585 W | 604 W | 92.2% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 561 W | 578 W | 88.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | G635-MCH72Mw | G655-MCH72Mw | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #716 | #184 | 14,005 | G655-MCH72Mw leads by 532 places | | Power density | #741 | #172 | 14,005 | G655-MCH72Mw leads by 569 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #3,152 | #2,055 | 14,005 | G655-MCH72Mw leads by 1,097 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #1,432 | #728 | 14,005 | G655-MCH72Mw leads by 704 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw or AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw? According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw** has higher module efficiency (**24.20%** vs **23.50%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw? **AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw** has a module efficiency of **23.50%**, while **AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw** is **24.20%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw? **AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw** uses **Back Contact** cells; **AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw? **AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G660-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g660-mch72mw) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g650-mch72mw) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G645-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g645-mch72mw) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G640-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g640-mch72mw) - One difference: module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G630-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g630-mch72mw) - One difference: module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G625-MCH72Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g625-mch72mw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-g635-mch72mw/aiko-aiko-g655-mch72mw Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.