---
title: "AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/mysolar-usa-ms720n-hjtgb"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB

AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.63 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | [Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms720n-hjtgb) |
| Manufacturer | AIKO | Mysolar USA |
| Power | 795 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Efficiency | 24.80 % | 23.17 % |
| Technology | Back Contact | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw | MS720N-HJTGB | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 24.80 % | 23.17 % | +1.63 pp for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw |
| Rated power | 795 Wp | 720 Wp | +75 W for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw |
| Power density | 247.5 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | +15.7 Wp/m² for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 30 yrs | +15 yrs for MS720N-HJTGB |
| Open-circuit voltage | 59.22 V | 50.75 V | 8.47 V apart |
| Module area | 3.212 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.106 m² apart |
| Weight per kWp | 50.1 kg/kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp | -3.8 kg/kWp for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw |
| Cell technology | Back Contact | HJT | Back Contact vs HJT |
| Voltage at max power | 49.27 V | 42.70 V | 6.57 V apart |
| Cell count | 156 | 132 | 24 cells apart |
| Weight | 39.8 kg | 38.8 kg | -1.0 kg for MS720N-HJTGB |
| Short-circuit current | 16.99 A | 17.67 A | 0.68 A apart |
| Dimensions | 2465x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Current at max power | 16.14 A | 16.87 A | 0.73 A apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw | MS720N-HJTGB |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 795 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 24.80 % | 23.17 % |
| Power density | 247.5 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 59.22 V | 50.75 V |
| Voltage at max power | 49.27 V | 42.70 V |
| Short-circuit current | 16.99 A | 17.67 A |
| Current at max power | 16.14 A | 16.87 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2465x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.212 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 39.8 kg | 38.8 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 50.1 kg/kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | - | 0.25 %/yr |
| Cell technology | Back Contact | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 156 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw:** 26,674 kWh
- **Cumulative output, MS720N-HJTGB:** 24,157 kWh
- **Gap:** 2,517 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw | MS720N-HJTGB | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 795 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 764 W | 692 W | 96.1% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 733 W | 664 W | 92.2% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 702 W | 636 W | 88.3% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw | MS720N-HJTGB | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #12 | #1,473 | 14,005 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 1,461 places |
| Power density | #38 | #1,347 | 14,005 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 1,309 places |
| Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #3,585 | #8,017 | 14,005 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 4,432 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #3 | #27 | 14,005 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 24 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw or Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?

According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw** has higher module efficiency (**24.80%** vs **23.17%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?

**AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw** has a module efficiency of **24.80%**, while **Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB** is **23.17%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw use vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?

**AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw** uses **Back Contact** cells; **Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?

**AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB bifacial panels?

Both **AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw** and **Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) - The same specification on paper
- [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) - One difference: module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw/mysolar-usa-ms720n-hjtgb

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

