--- title: "AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-445" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 2.50 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw) | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-445) | | Manufacturer | AIKO | Trina Solar | | Power | 495 Wp | 445 Wp | | Efficiency | 24.80 % | 22.30 % | | Technology | Back Contact | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 24.80 % | 22.30 % | +2.50 pp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | | Rated power | 495 Wp | 445 Wp | +50 W for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | | Power density | 247.7 Wp/m² | 222.7 Wp/m² | +25.0 Wp/m² for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | +0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | | Open-circuit voltage | 41.10 V | 52.60 V | 11.50 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 15.00 A | 10.71 A | 4.29 A apart | | Weight per kWp | 42.4 kg/kWp | 47.2 kg/kWp | -4.8 kg/kWp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | | Cell technology | Back Contact | TOPCon | Back Contact vs TOPCon | | Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | | Voltage at max power | 34.50 V | 44.30 V | 9.80 V apart | | Current at max power | 14.35 A | 10.05 A | 4.30 A apart | | Cell count | 108 | 144 | 36 cells apart | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 495 Wp | 445 Wp | | Module efficiency | 24.80 % | 22.30 % | | Power density | 247.7 Wp/m² | 222.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 41.10 V | 52.60 V | | Voltage at max power | 34.50 V | 44.30 V | | Short-circuit current | 15.00 A | 10.71 A | | Current at max power | 14.35 A | 10.05 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 21.0 kg | 21.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 42.4 kg/kWp | 47.2 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | Back Contact | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 144 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw:** 16,737 kWh - **Cumulative output, TSM-NEG9RC.27-445:** 14,931 kWh - **Gap:** 1,806 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 495 W | 445 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 476 W | 426 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 456 W | 406 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 437 W | 387 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw | TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #12 | #5,100 | 14,005 | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 5,088 places | | Power density | #37 | #5,302 | 14,005 | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 5,265 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #2,165 | 14,005 | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 1,654 places | | Weight | #219 | #1,537 | 14,005 | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 1,318 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,920 | #8,734 | 14,005 | AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 4,814 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw or Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445? According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** has higher module efficiency (**24.80%** vs **22.30%**); **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445? **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** has a module efficiency of **24.80%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445** is **22.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445? **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** uses **Back Contact** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445? **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 bifacial panels? **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A490-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a490-mce54mw) - One difference: module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a480-mce54mw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a475-mce54mw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a470-mce54mw) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-445/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-450) - One difference: module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-445 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.