--- title: "AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw A495-MCE54Mw leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw) | [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw) | | Manufacturer | AIKO | AIKO | | Power | 485 Wp | 495 Wp | | Efficiency | 24.30 % | 24.80 % | | Technology | Back Contact | Back Contact | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | A485-MCE54Mw | A495-MCE54Mw | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 24.30 % | 24.80 % | +0.50 pp for A495-MCE54Mw | | Power density | 242.7 Wp/m² | 247.7 Wp/m² | +5.0 Wp/m² for A495-MCE54Mw | | Rated power | 485 Wp | 495 Wp | +10 W for A495-MCE54Mw | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | A485-MCE54Mw | A495-MCE54Mw | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 485 Wp | 495 Wp | | Module efficiency | 24.30 % | 24.80 % | | Power density | 242.7 Wp/m² | 247.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 40.90 V | 41.10 V | | Voltage at max power | 34.30 V | 34.50 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.88 A | 15.00 A | | Current at max power | 14.15 A | 14.35 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 21.0 kg | 21.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 43.3 kg/kWp | 42.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr | | Cell technology | Back Contact | Back Contact | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 108 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, A485-MCE54Mw:** 16,399 kWh - **Cumulative output, A495-MCE54Mw:** 16,737 kWh - **Gap:** 338 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | A485-MCE54Mw | A495-MCE54Mw | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 485 W | 495 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 466 W | 476 W | 96.1% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 447 W | 456 W | 92.2% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 428 W | 437 W | 88.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | A485-MCE54Mw | A495-MCE54Mw | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #131 | #12 | 14,005 | A495-MCE54Mw leads by 119 places | | Power density | #140 | #37 | 14,005 | A495-MCE54Mw leads by 103 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #287 | #219 | 14,005 | A495-MCE54Mw leads by 68 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,833 | #3,920 | 14,005 | A495-MCE54Mw leads by 913 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw or AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw? According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** has higher module efficiency (**24.80%** vs **24.30%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw and AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw? **AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw** has a module efficiency of **24.30%**, while **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** is **24.80%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw? **AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw** uses **Back Contact** cells; **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** uses **Back Contact**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw and AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw? **AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A490-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a490-mce54mw) - One difference: module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a480-mce54mw) - One difference: module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a475-mce54mw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a470-mce54mw) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) - 13 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54mw/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.