---
title: "AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/bauer-solar-bs-475-120m10nhbb-gg"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG

AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.35 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db) | [Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/bauer-solar-bs-475-120m10nhbb-gg) |
| Manufacturer | AIKO | Bauer Solar |
| Power | 485 Wp | 475 Wp |
| Efficiency | 24.30 % | 21.95 % |
| Technology | Back Contact | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db | BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 24.30 % | 21.95 % | +2.35 pp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.040 %/°C for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Power density | 242.7 Wp/m² | 219.5 Wp/m² | +23.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG |
| Weight per kWp | 50.5 kg/kWp | 56.2 kg/kWp | -5.7 kg/kWp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.164 m² | 0.166 m² apart |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 26.7 kg | -2.2 kg for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Cell technology | Back Contact | TOPCon | Back Contact vs TOPCon |
| Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Rated power | 485 Wp | 475 Wp | +10 W for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db |
| Cell count | 108 | 120 | 12 cells apart |
| Open-circuit voltage | 40.90 V | 42.53 V | 1.63 V apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Short-circuit current | 14.88 A | 14.23 A | 0.65 A apart |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1908x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1908x1134x30 mm |
| Current at max power | 14.15 A | 13.49 A | 0.66 A apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db | BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 485 Wp | 475 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 24.30 % | 21.95 % |
| Power density | 242.7 Wp/m² | 219.5 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 40.90 V | 42.53 V |
| Voltage at max power | 34.30 V | 35.23 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.88 A | 14.23 A |
| Current at max power | 14.15 A | 13.49 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1908x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.164 m² |
| Weight | 24.5 kg | 26.7 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 50.5 kg/kWp | 56.2 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | Back Contact | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 120 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, AIKO-A485-MCE54Db:** 16,399 kWh
- **Cumulative output, BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG:** 15,937 kWh
- **Gap:** 462 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db | BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 485 W | 475 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 466 W | 454 W | 95.5% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 447 W | 432 W | 91.0% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 428 W | 411 W | 86.5% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db | BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #131 | #6,745 | 14,005 | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,614 places |
| Power density | #140 | #6,702 | 14,005 | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,562 places |
| Heat behaviour | #511 | #6,093 | 14,005 | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 5,582 places |
| Weight | #3,884 | #10,496 | 14,005 | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,612 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #2,953 | #5,017 | 14,005 | AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 2,064 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db or Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?

According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db** has higher module efficiency (**24.30%** vs **21.95%**); **AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?

**AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db** has a module efficiency of **24.30%**, while **Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG** is **21.95%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db use vs Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?

**AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db** uses **Back Contact** cells; **Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?

**AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG bifacial panels?

**Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/aiko-aiko-a480-mce54db) - One difference: module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/aiko-aiko-a475-mce54db) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/aiko-aiko-a470-mce54db) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/aiko-aiko-a465-mce54db) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db](https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/aiko-aiko-a460-mce54db) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG vs Bauer Solar BS-470-120M10NHBB-GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/bauer-solar-bs-475-120m10nhbb-gg/bauer-solar-bs-470-120m10nhbb-gg) - One difference: module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/aiko-aiko-a485-mce54db/bauer-solar-bs-475-120m10nhbb-gg

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.