--- title: "AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.03 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | [AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | | Manufacturer | AE Solar | AIKO | | Power | 725 Wp | 785 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.37 % | 24.40 % | | Technology | TOPCon | Back Contact | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | CME-132BDS-725 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.37 % | 24.40 % | +1.03 pp for AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 785 Wp | +60 W for AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | +0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | | Power density | 233.7 Wp/m² | 244.4 Wp/m² | +10.7 Wp/m² for AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 15 yrs | +15 yrs for CME-132BDS-725 | | Weight | 37.0 kg | 39.8 kg | -2.8 kg for CME-132BDS-725 | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.30 V | 59.02 V | 9.72 V apart | | Module area | 3.103 m² | 3.212 m² | 0.109 m² apart | | Short-circuit current | 18.46 A | 16.85 A | 1.61 A apart | | Cell technology | TOPCon | Back Contact | TOPCon vs Back Contact | | Voltage at max power | 41.50 V | 49.07 V | 7.57 V apart | | Cell count | 132 | 156 | 24 cells apart | | Current at max power | 17.47 A | 16.00 A | 1.47 A apart | | Dimensions | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2465x1303x33 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | CME-132BDS-725 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 785 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.37 % | 24.40 % | | Power density | 233.7 Wp/m² | 244.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.30 V | 59.02 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.50 V | 49.07 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.46 A | 16.85 A | | Current at max power | 17.47 A | 16.00 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2465x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.103 m² | 3.212 m² | | Weight | 37.0 kg | 39.8 kg | | Weight per kWp | 51.0 kg/kWp | 50.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | - | | Cell technology | TOPCon | Back Contact | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 156 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, CME-132BDS-725:** 24,325 kWh - **Cumulative output, AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw:** 26,338 kWh - **Gap:** 2,013 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | CME-132BDS-725 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 725 W | 785 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 693 W | 754 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 662 W | 724 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 630 W | 693 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | CME-132BDS-725 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #930 | #99 | 14,005 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw leads by 831 places | | Power density | #923 | #87 | 14,005 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw leads by 836 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #511 | 14,005 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw leads by 1,654 places | | Weight | #4,382 | #4,120 | 14,005 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw leads by 262 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #11 | #10 | 14,005 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw leads by 1 place | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 or AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw? According to our database: **AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw** has higher module efficiency (**24.40%** vs **23.37%**); **AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw? **AE Solar CME-132BDS-725** has a module efficiency of **23.37%**, while **AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw** is **24.40%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 use vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw? **AE Solar CME-132BDS-725** uses **TOPCon** cells; **AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw** uses **Back Contact**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw? **AE Solar CME-132BDS-725** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw bifacial panels? Both **AE Solar CME-132BDS-725** and **AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - The same specification on paper - [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) - One difference: product warranty - [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) - One difference: product warranty - [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) - The same specification on paper - [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) - One difference: product warranty - [AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/ae-solar-cme-132bds-715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.