--- title: "AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cmer-132bds-630" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cmer-132bds-630.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630 CME-132-725W leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 95 W more power. 9 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AE Solar CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | [AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cmer-132bds-630) | | Manufacturer | AE Solar | AE Solar | | Power | 725 Wp | 630 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.37 % | 23.34 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | CME-132-725W | CMER-132BDS-630 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 630 Wp | +95 W for CME-132-725W | | Weight per kWp | 43.4 kg/kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp | -10.0 kg/kWp for CME-132-725W | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 30 yrs | +15 yrs for CMER-132BDS-630 | | Short-circuit current | 18.46 A | 16.09 A | 2.37 A apart | | Module area | 3.103 m² | 2.700 m² | 0.403 m² apart | | Weight | 31.5 kg | 33.7 kg | -2.2 kg for CME-132-725W | | Current at max power | 17.47 A | 15.00 A | 2.47 A apart | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | | Dimensions | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2383x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | CME-132-725W | CMER-132BDS-630 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 630 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.37 % | 23.34 % | | Power density | 233.7 Wp/m² | 233.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.30 V | 50.20 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.50 V | 42.00 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.46 A | 16.09 A | | Current at max power | 17.47 A | 15.00 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2383x1133x30 mm | | Module area | 3.103 m² | 2.700 m² | | Weight | 31.5 kg | 33.7 kg | | Weight per kWp | 43.4 kg/kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 30 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | - | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, CME-132-725W:** 24,325 kWh - **Cumulative output, CMER-132BDS-630:** 21,138 kWh - **Gap:** 3,187 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | CME-132-725W | CMER-132BDS-630 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 725 W | 630 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 693 W | 603 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 662 W | 575 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 630 W | 548 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | CME-132-725W | CMER-132BDS-630 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #930 | #943 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 13 places | | Power density | #923 | #996 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 73 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #299 | #7,467 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 7,168 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #230 | #310 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 80 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132-725W or AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630? According to our database: **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.37%** vs **23.34%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630? **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** has a module efficiency of **23.37%**, while **AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630** is **23.34%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132-725W use vs AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630? **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630? **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630 bifacial panels? **AE Solar CMER-132BDS-630** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - 4 differences, the largest is weight - [AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) - 3 differences, the largest is weight - [AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) - 4 differences, the largest is weight - [AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) - 3 differences, the largest is weight - [AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) - One difference: product warranty - [AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) - 4 differences, the largest is weight --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132-725w/ae-solar-cmer-132bds-630 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.