---
title: "AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-435w"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W

435W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.26 pp more efficient. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w) | [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-435w) |
| Manufacturer | AE Solar | AE Solar |
| Power | 430 Wp | 435 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.05 % | 22.31 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 430W | 435W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.05 % | 22.31 % | +0.26 pp for 435W |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 430W | 435W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 430 Wp | 435 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.05 % | 22.31 % |
| Power density | 220.5 Wp/m² | 223.1 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 38.46 V | 38.66 V |
| Voltage at max power | 32.64 V | 32.84 V |
| Short-circuit current | 13.98 A | 14.06 A |
| Current at max power | 13.17 A | 13.25 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1721x1133x30 mm | 1721x1133x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.950 m² | 1.950 m² |
| Weight | 23.5 kg | 23.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 54.7 kg/kWp | 54.0 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | - | - |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 108 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 430W:** 14,427 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 435W:** 14,595 kWh
- **Gap:** 168 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 430W | 435W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 430 W | 435 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 411 W | 416 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 393 W | 397 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 374 W | 378 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 430W | 435W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #6,233 | #5,082 | 14,005 | 435W leads by 1,151 places |
| Power density | #6,191 | #5,070 | 14,005 | 435W leads by 1,121 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #9,028 | #8,229 | 14,005 | 435W leads by 799 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,424 | #5,914 | 14,005 | 435W leads by 510 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W or AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W?

According to our database: **AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**435 W**** has higher module efficiency (**22.31%** vs **22.05%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W?

**AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**430 W**** has a module efficiency of **22.05%**, while **AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**435 W**** is **22.31%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W use vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W?

**AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**430 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**435 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W?

**AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**430 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**435 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W bifacial panels?

Both **AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**430 W**** and **AE Solar CMD-108BDE-**435 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-425w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-420W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-420w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-415W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-415w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-430w/ae-solar-cmd-108bde-435w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

