---
title: "AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720

CME-132BDS-720 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.64 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde) | [AE Solar CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) |
| Manufacturer | AE Solar | AE Solar |
| Power | 440 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.57 % | 23.21 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | AExxxCMD-108BDE | CME-132BDS-720 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.57 % | 23.21 % | +0.64 pp for CME-132BDS-720 |
| Rated power | 440 Wp | 720 Wp | +280 W for CME-132BDS-720 |
| Weight | 21.5 kg | 37.0 kg | -15.5 kg for AExxxCMD-108BDE |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 30 yrs | +15 yrs for CME-132BDS-720 |
| Power density | 225.7 Wp/m² | 232.1 Wp/m² | +6.4 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-720 |
| Open-circuit voltage | 38.95 V | 49.10 V | 10.15 V apart |
| Short-circuit current | 14.12 A | 18.43 A | 4.31 A apart |
| Module area | 1.950 m² | 3.103 m² | 1.153 m² apart |
| Voltage at max power | 33.01 V | 41.30 V | 8.29 V apart |
| Current at max power | 13.33 A | 17.43 A | 4.10 A apart |
| Cell count | 108 | 132 | 24 cells apart |
| Weight per kWp | 48.9 kg/kWp | 51.4 kg/kWp | -2.5 kg/kWp for AExxxCMD-108BDE |
| Dimensions | 1721x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm | 1721x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | AExxxCMD-108BDE | CME-132BDS-720 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 440 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.57 % | 23.21 % |
| Power density | 225.7 Wp/m² | 232.1 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 38.95 V | 49.10 V |
| Voltage at max power | 33.01 V | 41.30 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.12 A | 18.43 A |
| Current at max power | 13.33 A | 17.43 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1721x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.950 m² | 3.103 m² |
| Weight | 21.5 kg | 37.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 48.9 kg/kWp | 51.4 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, AExxxCMD-108BDE:** 14,763 kWh
- **Cumulative output, CME-132BDS-720:** 24,157 kWh
- **Gap:** 9,394 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | AExxxCMD-108BDE | CME-132BDS-720 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 440 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 421 W | 689 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 402 W | 657 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 383 W | 626 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | AExxxCMD-108BDE | CME-132BDS-720 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #3,836 | #1,282 | 13,953 | CME-132BDS-720 leads by 2,554 places |
| Power density | #3,802 | #1,322 | 13,953 | CME-132BDS-720 leads by 2,480 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,146 | #2,146 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #2,528 | #4,750 | 13,953 | AExxxCMD-108BDE leads by 2,222 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #8,570 | #22 | 13,953 | CME-132BDS-720 leads by 8,548 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE or AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?

According to our database: **AE Solar CME-132BDS-720** has higher module efficiency (**23.21%** vs **22.57%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?

**AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE** has a module efficiency of **22.57%**, while **AE Solar CME-132BDS-720** is **23.21%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?

**AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE** uses **TOPCon** cells; **AE Solar CME-132BDS-720** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?

**AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AE Solar CME-132BDS-720** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 bifacial panels?

Both **AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE** and **AE Solar CME-132BDS-720** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-aexxxcmd-108bde/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

