---
title: "AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W

CME-132BDS-730W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.61 pp more efficient. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w) | [AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) |
| Manufacturer | AE Solar | AE Solar |
| Power | 540 Wp | 730 Wp |
| Efficiency | 20.92 % | 23.53 % |
| Technology | PERC | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) | CME-132BDS-730W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 20.92 % | 23.53 % | +2.61 pp for CME-132BDS-730W |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | +0.060 %/°C for CME-132BDS-730W |
| Rated power | 540 Wp | 730 Wp | +190 W for CME-132BDS-730W |
| Power density | 209.2 Wp/m² | 235.3 Wp/m² | +26.1 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-730W |
| Weight | 26.5 kg | 37.0 kg | -10.5 kg for AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) |
| Short-circuit current | 13.57 A | 18.49 A | 4.92 A apart |
| Module area | 2.581 m² | 3.103 m² | 0.522 m² apart |
| Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon | PERC vs TOPCon |
| Current at max power | 12.81 A | 17.51 A | 4.70 A apart |
| Cell count | 144 | 132 | 12 cells apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Dimensions | 2278x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) | CME-132BDS-730W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 540 Wp | 730 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 20.92 % | 23.53 % |
| Power density | 209.2 Wp/m² | 235.3 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.90 V | 49.50 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.15 V | 41.70 V |
| Short-circuit current | 13.57 A | 18.49 A |
| Current at max power | 12.81 A | 17.51 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2278x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.581 m² | 3.103 m² |
| Weight | 26.5 kg | 37.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 49.1 kg/kWp | 50.7 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | - | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 132 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W):** 17,826 kWh
- **Cumulative output, CME-132BDS-730W:** 24,493 kWh
- **Gap:** 6,667 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) | CME-132BDS-730W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 540 W | 730 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 512 W | 698 W | 94.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 483 W | 666 W | 89.5% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 455 W | 635 W | 84.2% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) | CME-132BDS-730W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #10,014 | #674 | 14,005 | CME-132BDS-730W leads by 9,340 places |
| Power density | #10,065 | #672 | 14,005 | CME-132BDS-730W leads by 9,393 places |
| Heat behaviour | #10,419 | #2,165 | 14,005 | CME-132BDS-730W leads by 8,254 places |
| Weight | #2,710 | #4,111 | 14,005 | AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) leads by 1,401 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,996 | #190 | 14,005 | CME-132BDS-730W leads by 6,806 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) or AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W?

According to our database: **AE Solar CME-132BDS-**730 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.53%** vs **20.92%**); **AE Solar CME-132BDS-**730 W**** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.290%/°C** vs **-0.350%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W?

**AE Solar AE MD-144 **530 W**-**550 W** (**540 W**)** has a module efficiency of **20.92%**, while **AE Solar CME-132BDS-**730 W**** is **23.53%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W?

**AE Solar AE MD-144 **530 W**-**550 W** (**540 W**)** uses **PERC** cells; **AE Solar CME-132BDS-**730 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W?

**AE Solar AE MD-144 **530 W**-**550 W** (**540 W**)** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AE Solar CME-132BDS-**730 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W bifacial panels?

**AE Solar CME-132BDS-**730 W**** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AE Solar AE MD-144 **530 W**-**550 W** (**540 W**)** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (550W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-550w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (545W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-545w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-535w) - The same specification on paper
- [AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (530W)](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-530w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - One difference: product warranty
- [AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) - One difference: product warranty


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-md-144-530w-550w-540w/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

