---
title: "AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG

10 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [AE Solar AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | [Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1) |
| Manufacturer | AE Solar | Luxor Solar |
| Power | 720 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.21 % | 23.39 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | AE CME-132 720 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C | +0.050 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+ GG |
| Weight | 31.5 kg | 38.7 kg | -7.2 kg for AE CME-132 720 |
| Weight per kWp | 43.8 kg/kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | -10.0 kg/kWp for AE CME-132 720 |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | HJT | TOPCon vs HJT |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.10 V | 51.39 V | 2.29 V apart |
| Short-circuit current | 18.43 A | 17.54 A | 0.89 A apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Voltage at max power | 41.30 V | 43.68 V | 2.38 V apart |
| Dimensions | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Current at max power | 17.43 A | 16.49 A | 0.94 A apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | AE CME-132 720 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 720 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.21 % | 23.39 % |
| Power density | 232.1 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.10 V | 51.39 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.30 V | 43.68 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.43 A | 17.54 A |
| Current at max power | 17.43 A | 16.49 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.103 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 31.5 kg | 38.7 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 43.8 kg/kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | - | 0.21 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, AE CME-132 720:** 24,157 kWh
- **Cumulative output, LX-720M/210-132+ GG:** 24,157 kWh
- **Gap:** No difference


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | AE CME-132 720 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 720 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 689 W | 694 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 657 W | 668 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 626 W | 642 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | AE CME-132 720 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,299 | #925 | 14,005 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 374 places |
| Power density | #1,339 | #1,347 | 14,005 | AE CME-132 720 leads by 8 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #13 | 14,005 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 2,152 places |
| Weight | #336 | #7,805 | 14,005 | AE CME-132 720 leads by 7,469 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #19 | #17 | 14,005 | LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 2 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 or Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?

According to our database: **Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG** has higher module efficiency (**23.39%** vs **23.21%**); **Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.240%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?

**AE Solar AE CME-132 720** has a module efficiency of **23.21%**, while **Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG** is **23.39%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does AE Solar AE CME-132 720 use vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?

**AE Solar AE CME-132 720** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?

**AE Solar AE CME-132 720** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG bifacial panels?

**Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AE Solar AE CME-132 720** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - 6 differences, the largest is weight
- [AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) - 7 differences, the largest is weight
- [AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) - 3 differences, the largest is weight
- [AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) - One difference: product warranty
- [AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) - 4 differences, the largest is weight
- [AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) - 3 differences, the largest is weight


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

