--- title: "AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132-725w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W CME-132-725W leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.06 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435) | [AE Solar CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | | Manufacturer | AE Solar | AE Solar | | Power | 435 Wp | 725 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.31 % | 23.37 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | AE CMD-108BDE-435 | CME-132-725W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.31 % | 23.37 % | +1.06 pp for CME-132-725W | | Rated power | 435 Wp | 725 Wp | +290 W for CME-132-725W | | Power density | 223.1 Wp/m² | 233.7 Wp/m² | +10.6 Wp/m² for CME-132-725W | | Weight | 23.5 kg | 31.5 kg | -8.0 kg for AE CMD-108BDE-435 | | Weight per kWp | 54.0 kg/kWp | 43.4 kg/kWp | -10.6 kg/kWp for CME-132-725W | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 15 yrs | +15 yrs for AE CMD-108BDE-435 | | Open-circuit voltage | 38.66 V | 49.30 V | 10.64 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.06 A | 18.46 A | 4.40 A apart | | Module area | 1.950 m² | 3.103 m² | 1.153 m² apart | | Voltage at max power | 32.84 V | 41.50 V | 8.66 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.25 A | 17.47 A | 4.22 A apart | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | 24 cells apart | | Bifacial | Yes | No | Yes vs No | | Dimensions | 1721x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm | 1721x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | AE CMD-108BDE-435 | CME-132-725W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 435 Wp | 725 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.31 % | 23.37 % | | Power density | 223.1 Wp/m² | 233.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 38.66 V | 49.30 V | | Voltage at max power | 32.84 V | 41.50 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.06 A | 18.46 A | | Current at max power | 13.25 A | 17.47 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1721x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm | | Module area | 1.950 m² | 3.103 m² | | Weight | 23.5 kg | 31.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 54.0 kg/kWp | 43.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, AE CMD-108BDE-435:** 14,595 kWh - **Cumulative output, CME-132-725W:** 24,325 kWh - **Gap:** 9,730 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | AE CMD-108BDE-435 | CME-132-725W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 435 W | 725 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 416 W | 693 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 397 W | 662 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 378 W | 630 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | AE CMD-108BDE-435 | CME-132-725W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #5,082 | #930 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 4,152 places | | Power density | #5,070 | #923 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 4,147 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #8,229 | #299 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 7,930 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,914 | #230 | 14,005 | CME-132-725W leads by 5,684 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 or AE Solar CME-132-725W? According to our database: **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.37%** vs **22.31%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 and AE Solar CME-132-725W? **AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435** has a module efficiency of **22.31%**, while **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** is **23.37%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 use vs AE Solar CME-132-725W? **AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435** uses **TOPCon** cells; **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 and AE Solar CME-132-725W? **AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435** has a **30 years** power warranty; **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 and AE Solar CME-132-725W bifacial panels? **AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **AE Solar CME-132-**725 W**** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ae-solar-ae-cmd-108bde-435/ae-solar-cme-132-725w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.